Historical Lies as an Instrument of Domination

Historical Lies as an instrument of domination

by Adrian Salbuchi – October 2006

“Whoever controls the past, controls the present;
whoever controls the present, controls the future”
George Orwell – “1984″

“History is not merely the “past”. It is usually the shape of the
torments and struggles of the present That is why
with history there are – and there must be – different
historical interpretations… The task of an independently
minded person lies in analyzing the connections that exist
among historical and social processes. This needs to be protected
from the criticism of those person who always want to confront
“absolute evil” with “absolute good”.
Norberto R. Ceresole – “La falsificación de la realidad”

“Reality is the sole Truth that there is”
Juan D. Perón

To know its own past – its History – is as important for a Nation, as it is important for an individual to know who he is, where he comes from and where his roots lie. A person suffering from amnesia is defenseless and risks being fooled and taken advantage of by any rogue who makes believe that he is a “friend”, or a “brother”, or a “relative”.

What happens to such people can also occur to entire nations should they forget, confuse or become unacquainted with their own past. Today, considering the modern technologies available, this can even happen on a worldwide scale.

At present, there are immensely powerful and select groups of people who wield the necessary resources to literally control our vision of the past – i.e., mankind’s History – and the present, thus derailing Reality, which can then be suitably substituted by a sort of “virtual reality”, fully aligned with their own – often shameful – objectives and interests.

THE “HOLOCAUST INDUSTRY”

With this insinuating title, American historian Norman Finkelstein, professor of Political Theory at City University of New York at Hunter College, published in 2000 a very thought-provoking book: “The Holocaust Industry: Reflections on the Exploitation of Jewish Suffering”, in which he criticizes the powerful financial and geopolitical interests behind certain groups promoting, in an exaggerated manner, the so-called Jewish “Holocaust”. Their aim being, amongst many others, to extract huge sums of money for the State of Israel from groups of “wealthy victims”: i.e., Swiss banks, the US and German governments, major German corporations and other present and future victims.

Finkelstein defines Israel as a “terrorist State”, i.e., an invading and highly dangerous country, not just for peace in the Middle East but for the peace of the world as a whole, particularly considering its huge nuclear capabilities thanks to the atomic Weapons of Mass Destruction it possesses which were submissively and obediently ceded to them by the United States of America over the last couple of decades.

Norman Finkelstein is a friend and close colleague of Noam Chomsky whom he recognizes as his mentor, both men being prestigious Anti-Zionist Jewish intellectuals living in the US. Finkelstein won for himself the rage of super-powerful international Zionist interests by describing the main Zionist organizations and operators as “gangsters” and “delinquents”; additionally, he described Holocaust mastermind Elie Wiesel([1]) as their “resident clown”. He also claimed that Zionist demands for enormous monetary reparations from Germany were a form of shameless “blackmail”.

The interesting point is that Finkelstein is part of a growing breed of historians, journalists, intellectuals and large sectors of international public opinion which do not meekly accept the Holocaust Dogma propagated by the private power centres of the New World Order based in the cities of New York, London, Paris and Jerusalem. This large sector of intellectually independent people believe that the “Holocaust Industry” – as Finkelstein aptly describes it – is shamelessly used not only to steal public and private moneys around the world for the benefit of the State of Israel, but also to justify the constant acts of genocide and aggression perpetrated by Israel against the captive Palestinian people to this very day. It can also be inferred that this is being used right now to prepare future attacks in various parts of the world which are becoming hit spots in the global geopolitical arena: Iran, Siria, the Triple Border in South America (Argentina, Brazil and Paraguay), and elsewhere.

INTELLECTUAL TERRORISM

In today’s so-called free and “developed” world, there exists certain gross intellectual terrorism aimed at forbidding – in some countries even punishing with imprisonment – any research and publication of opinions or investigations questioning the Holocaust Dogma. Thus, over the years we have seen the persecution and incarceration of prestigious historians, such as French-born Robert Fuarisson, physical attacks on investigation centres like the Institute of Historical Review of California, the imprisonment of German researcher Ernst Zündel and, more recently, the arrest of English historian David Irving in Austria based on old charges dating back to 1989 when he dared to give a conference questioning the official history of 6 million Jews killed in German concentration camps during World War II. David Irving asserts – and many researchers agree – that irrespective of the fact that Jews were persecuted by National Socialist Germany, there is no verifiable evidence to support the tremendous figure of 6 million killed.([2])

Today, this rather emblematic and cabalistic figure – Six Million – is accepted as bona fide by global public opinion, not because it is supported by any solid historical research and evidence, but rather because it has been systematically repeated, dramatized and practically drilled into the collective psyche of humanity. This has been achieved thanks to the hundreds of billions of dollars which over the past sixty years have been poured into financing gruesom propaganda films, documentaries, books, novels, interviews, memoires, public events, monuments, memorials, Political Action Groups, and many other collective psychological actions bent on imposing the “6 million Holocaust” figure as real, irrespective of the fact that that figure lacks rigorous documentary support.

One of the many instruments of psychological warfare used in this process is the Anti-Difamation League (ADL – www.adl.org) based in New York City, one of the more militant attack organizations in charge of attacking by all imaginable means, anyone who questions the Holocaust Myth, anywhere in the world. Using very well financed aggressive methods, and counting with extensive media coverage from the international multimedia monopolies, the ADL exerts what can only be described as intellectual terrorism tactics with the intent of suppressing all criticism of Zionism, its worldwide objectives and its key players and operators. When such criticism arises anywhere in the world, the ADL will normally immediately strike back – often in hysterical tones – with accusations of “anti-semitism!” against anyone promoting serious historical investigation of these fundamental matters, or if Israeli State policies are criticized. Amongst their many tactics, they improperly and hypocritically equate “anti-semitism” with “anti-zionism”([3]). Not surprisingly, the ADL operates closely with the most influential and exclusive of Jewish Masonic Lodges: the powerful B´Nai B´Rith.

SPEAKING ONE’S MIND…

It is within this frame of thought that we should approach the strong statements recently made by Iranian President, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad in Mecca, Saudi Arabia and elsewhere, when he expressed doubts about the veracity of the “Official History” surrounding the Jewish Holocaust, and suggested that the State of Israel should be moved to Europe.

Those statements naturally generated immediate rejection from powerful Zionist organizations the world over, and from governments and multimedia under their control, notably the present Administrations in the United States of America, the United Kingdom, Germany, Austria and, of course, Israel itself. However, and in spite the bad press which Iran and its present government have in the “Western” media, Mr Ahmadinejad’s rationale is historically very correct. Amongst other concepts, Iran’s president stated that “some countries insist in saying that Hitler killed millions of innocent Jews in a boiler, and they insist on this to such an extent that anyone contradicting what they condemn is immediately sent to prison” (for example, historian David Irving is today in an Austrian prison for this very reason). “Although we do not accept this statement (i.e., the scope and extension of the “Holocaust”), if we were to assume that it is, in fact, true then our question to the Europeans is: “Is the killing of innocent Jewish people by Hitler the reason why you back the occupiers of Jerusalem?” “Now that you admit that Jews were persecuted, why should Muslim Palestinians pay the price of those crimes? Since you (the Europeans) were the ones who persecuted them, you should offer a piece of land to the Zionist regime so that it can establish the most suitable government for its needs”, said Ahmadinejad. “Let Germany and Austria give two or three of their provinces to the Zionist regime and the problem will be resolved right then and there”.([4])

Undoubtedly, Mr Ahmadinejad is hitting the nail on the head with these statements and this was reflected by the myriad of noisy hysterical reactions from the “Western democracies”, starting with the newly-elected German Chancellor Angela Merkel, who described as “totally unacceptable” the Iranian president’s statements, reminding the world’s public opinion that “considering our own historical responsibility, I can only say that we reject those statements in the harshest of terms”.

This easily begs the question: Why does the new German Chancellor “reject” Mr. Ahmadinejad’s proposal? If today’s German Government is so convinced as to the truthfulness of the 6 million Jews killed during the Holocaust by the German Reich, and if the German government accepts what millions of people inside and outside of that once great Nation believe to be a historical lie, then let Germany and Austria (officially, the perpetrators of the “Holocaust”) cede to Zionist interests in compensation, one of their beautiful Länder; say, Schlesswig, or Westphalia, or Brandenburg, or – why not? -, even historical Bavaria… That seems to make a lot of sense.

Having thrown the problem on the Palestinians, robbing them of their Nation may be very comforting for today’s bourgeois and decadent Germans and Austrians, but the cost this has had for the Palestinians is one of genocide, bloodshed, torture, and immense suffering, misery and humiliation. Why should Palestinians pay for the past actions of Germans and Austrians? All the more when Israel’s intrusion into the Muslim world has been the cause of almost sixty years of uninterrupted wars, invasions, and crimes against practically every Islamic people in the Middle East by the military forces of the State of Israel, the United States of America, and Britain.

Ursula Plassnik, Austria’s minister of foreign relations, in turn, stated that “there can be no doubts about the right of Israel to exist”, alluding not only to these statements by president Ahmadinejad, but also to those he made not long ago saying that “Israel should be erased from the map”. In turn, Raanan Gissin, spokesman for Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon, expressed his concern about “existing consensus amongst many circles in the Arab world that Jews do not have a right to establish a democratic Jewish State in their ancestral homeland”.

We would add that not only the Arab world questions Jewish rights to usurp other people’s land as Israel did with Palestine, but also in our own South American continent and in Argentina, in particular, many people share precisely that very same point of view. Mr. Gissin even reminded President Ahmadinejad that “we Jews have been here long before your ancestors”, adding that “thank God we have that capability to disuade and prevent such statements from becoming reality”.

Israel’s position is really strikingly interesting. Imagine if all the peoples and ethnic groups around the world were to start claiming back those lands which according to their own Sacred Books and cultural, religious and ethnic-racial traditions belonged to them because “their ancestors were there before”. No doubt, we would then see very dramatic changes in the political map of the world.

Suffice it to say that practically all people living in North America, for example, would have to vacate all of that territory forceably occupied by their ancestors, and give it back to the Sioux, Chinook, Tonkawa, Wichita, Ute, Apache, Delaware, Algonquin, Iowa, Cheyenne, Mojave, Mohawk, Chocktaw, Iroquí, Miami and Omaha nations, and the many other native tribes whose lands were stolen from them by the government of the United States during almost four centuries of invasions and genocide. There can be no doubt that these native tribes “were there long before” the English, Dutch, Spanish, Portuguese, and German conquerors, and even before Jewish immigrants established themselves in North America founding one of the most voracious and aggressive Empires the world has ever known: the United States of America.

Similarly, in our South American latitudes we Argentineans for example – at least those of us who are of Italian, Spanish and Saxon stock together with members of our large Jewish community – should all start packing our bags too, vacating these lands that were usurped only a couple of centuries ago by our forefathers, and giving them back to the tribal communities of the Ranquels, Pampas, Mapuches, Comechingones, Guaranís, Tobas, Selcnam, Aymaras, Quilmes and Guayaquís, amongst many other native Nations.

Lastly, regarding Isarael’s “capacity to disuade and prevent” mentioned by President Ariel Sharon’s spokesman, there can be no doubt that Israel does in fact have such capabilities, since today the forces of Israeli Zionism have managed to hijack the Government of the United States of America itself, which today serves as a docile instrument subordinated to worldwide Zionist geo-political interests and its clearly messianic and racist objectives. This unusual, highly complex and dangerous process whereby the Government of the United States was hijacked by International Zionism can be verified in the so-called “Project for a New American Century” (www.newamericancentury.org), regarding which we provide details in Chapter V. of our essay “Bienvenidos a la Jungla…:” ([5])

WHY SHOULD WE CARE ABOUT ALL OF THIS?

Every time that Argentina’s naive press talks about these matters, it always does so out of proper context; with often incomplete information, and almost always in a distorted manner. This is a consequence of our local media’s forced alignment to the global vision imposed by the Establishment which today “owns” and controls the New World Order. In short, they are obediently aligned to International Zionist interests and aims.

Thus, we read in our morning Buenos Aires daily newspaper “Clarín” of December 10, 2005, that the statements made by the Iranian President “express an anti-Semitic, intolerant, belligerent and anti-democratic sentiment”, as declared in a joint press release representatives of AMIA, DAIA and the Argentine Zionist Organization, who demanded that President Néstor Kirchner join them in condemning the Iranian President for his statements”. Surely, Mr. Kirchner will promptly oblige, whilst that same newspaper article again unleashed accusations regarding the “nuclear danger” posed by Iran, ignoring the fact that today’s real nuclear threat against world peace comes from the United States, Israel and the United Kingdom([6]). “Clarín” even voices the hardly veiled threat regarding an imminent Israeli military attack on Iran, reminding us that “Israel wants a firmer attitude from the international community on the nuclear program being developed by Tehran. In 1981, the Israeli Air Force bombed the Iraqi nuclear reactor at Osirak, some 17 kilometres south of Baghdad.” This Buenos Aires newspaper forgets to mention that back then, the United Nations did not even bother to sanction Israel for that premeditated attack against Iraq’s territory, even though today’s obedient UN Secretary General Koffi Annan has just said that he was “horrorified” at president Ahmadinejad’s declarations whereby he question if there was truth behind the Holocaust Myth.

Turning to Argentina, Zionist pressure on our country dates back a long time, ever since the founder of the International Zionist Movement, the Austrian-born Theodor Herzl proposed in 1896 – over a century ago now – that an Israeli State be founded on Argentine territory, “in exchange for some sort of financial compensation”. This leads us to ask whether the artificially generated and fraudulent Foreign Debt of Argentina may not be part of some long-term plan geared on imposing upon our country some sort of “Debt for Territory Swap” in some future carefully engineered “foreign debt crisis”. Even “The New York Times” insinuated something of this sort during Argentina’s 2001/2 IMF-induced financial meltdown which generated huge profits for major international private banks, when they published an article with the eloquent title “Some in Argentina See Secession as the Answer to Economic Peril”([7])
Today, external pressure on Argentina over the as yet unresolved cases of the terrorist bombings in Buenos Aires of the Israeli Embassy (March 1992) and the AMIA Israeli Mutual Building (July 1994), are geared on falsely blaming Iran for both attacks, which has resulted in tremendous damage to diplomatic relations between Argentina and Iran. Over the past decade, this has also generated huge economic loss for our country to the tune of billions of dollars in lost trade with Iran and – far more serious – it dangerously drags Argentina to becoming directly involved in the war of aggression which the United States, Israel and Britain are presently promoting and preparing against Iran. At an ethical level, successive Argentine governments over the past thirteen years have behaved despicably by attacking and insulting the noble and proud people of Iran for no justifiable reason aside from playing into Zionist interests.

The potentially catastrophic consequences for our country of tolerating such manoeuvres on the part of the intelligence services of certain foreign States can hardly be emphasized. Today, Argentina faces serious danger by being in the hands of a government made up of people totally ignorant in such international matters like President Néstor Kirchner, who entrusted our Ministry of Foreign Affairs to a weak and incapable person like Rafael Bielsa who could not even make up his mind whether to become a national deputy or Ambassador to France, thus generating a very embarrassing diplomatic crisis with France. ([8])

WHO, THEN, ARE OUR REAL ENEMIES? WHERE ARE THEY?

The very fact that a country sets up sovereign Nation-State structures, implies that it must interact with other sovereign Nation-States and with other external players on the global geopolitical arena. This is a fact of life, whether we want it or not, and whether we like it or not.

To be able to approach today’s complex and highly dangerous global environment over which Argentina has little or no control, nor power, we first need to begin by understanding the global political, financial, ideological and social arena. We need to know how it works; identifying which are the threats and opportunities that we face in it in order to then be able to design suitable policies and action plans, promoting our objectives and strengthening our interests.

A viable Nation has specific instruments to deal with this: a Ministry of Foreign Affairs, a Ministry of Defence and – hopefully – a President who is minimally capable, psychologically balanced and intellectually awake to these huge challenges.

Real Politics are waged in the global arena and take the form of what is called Foreign Policy. This is so, irrespective of how much this may bother our local “political leadership” who only seem to thrive in their petty sewer-like wheelings and dealings, whether in Congress, in the Courts or in the Presidential Palace and its ministries.

Real Politics are waged through a Nation’s Foreign Policy. That is where a Nation measures itself against other States and players, many of which are vastly more powerful. That is where true statesmen shine, whilst clownlike fools fall.

A fundamental truism of a successful Foreign Policy is that you begin by identifying friendly States and players, differentiating them from those States and players which are explicit or implicit enemies; or at least adversaries. Only then can a Nation forge alliances with the former and take preventive defensive measures against the latter.

States and players identified as “enemies” are not so labled because they are “bad” in any moral sense, but rather because they pursue other interests and objectives which do not coincide with our own, and by thus promoting them, they might – and often do – come into direct or indirect conflict with our country.

Now, when these external States and players identified as enemies or adversaries are vastly more powerful than ourselves and, on top of that, are clearly aggressive then we really do have a problem. And when a nation is confronted with a challenge of this sort, it has no choice but to do something about it because, if left alone, that challenge will definitely not disappear. On the contrary, it will increase its levels of danger, pressure and threat. In our case, that will be the case until such time as the Argentine Nation-State can do nothing about this growing pressure, other than meekly and systematically giving way in the face of foreign interests and objectives. The results so far have been that the legitimate objectives and interests of the Argentine People geared on securing its welfare and “pursuing its happiness” have been frustrated and damaged.

As mentioned above, management of this complex scenario is done by a Nation’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs, its Armed Forces, its Economy Ministry; in other words, these are the reasons why any sovereign country has a Nation-State to begin with. The political structures of the Nation-State are thus entrusted to a group of citizens forming what we call “The Government”, which administers – for better or for worse – the destinies of the country and its people.

We can only stress that putting in office a Government made up of incompetent individuals, to command the sovereign power structures of the State can clearly lead to a fatal outcome for our Nation. This is why today Argentina needs to approach the complex international arena from a different angle, clearly aligned with:

(a) a balanced outlook regarding contemporary history (in order to better understand the origins of the worldwide and national problems);

(b) a balanced outlook regarding the titanic forces that today drive, form and distort world politics (in order to better understand the threats that we face) and , above all,

(c) a balanced outlook aligned with Argentina’s own National Interest; in other words, with the Common Good and Well Being of the vast majority of our 39 million citizens and not just the interests of any one of its social, economic or ethnic minorities (in order to preserve the whole Nation and not just a part).

Firstly then, it seems rather suspicious the way in which our local multimedia and opinion-setters are systematically aligned with the views and interests promoted by “Official History” originating in the most powerful and violent nations of the world. Nations that, both in the past as well as today, are the real and concrete enemies of Argentina – or at least our adversaries -: i.e., the United Kingdom and the United States of America; and which since many decades have uninterruptedly attacked us on the economic, financial, political, moral, and military fronts, be it directly or through their agents and operators in private and public sectors inside our country.

Thus, for example, and with respect to the complex events surrounding World War II – a cataclysmic war that decided who would own the planet for decades to come – and its outcome, our leadership has adopted the irrational position of considering as our “enemy” a Germany defeated in that war of over sixty years ago and since then permanently satanized. However, the truth is that Germany and its then main ally Japan, never attacked Argentina nor our continent in any way whatsoever, nor did they ever attack or harm our vital national interests, which is something that the United States and Britain have systematically done to this very day.

We should also not forget that the Soviet Union (then an ally of the United States and England during WWII), launched in the sixties a gruesome guerrilla war against Argentina triggering a veritable civil war in our country. In that way, we fell under a carefully synchronized two-pronged attack whereby the Argentine people suffered aggressions, on the one hand from the USSR through the treacherous guerrilla warfare perpetrated by “young idealist” fighters as president Kirchner now calls them, and on the other hand from the repression and outright treason perpetrated by a military-civilian government which, with the help of the United States, took over the Argentine State by force and then became stupidly aligned with the geopolitical interests of the US and its allies ([9]).

Thus, we arrived at the irrational attitude of considering the United States, Britain and Israel as our “friends”, when they are clearly not friends of ours (at least, they certainly do not behave as such); whilst we consider the forces opposing the Anglo-American-Israeli empire to be our “enemies”: starting with Germany and Japan as historical players in the greatest war of the Twentieth Century, to today’s Iran and the Islamic liberation organizations in Palestine, Iraq and Afghanistan. Argentina has thus become a cultural and intellectual colony. Observing the way our political leadership and mass media operate, one would even think that a large part of our population enjoys drinking the huge amounts of poison with which government and media force-fed us every day.

IT’S GOT NOTHING TO DO WITH US…

The State of Israel is a foreign country and an ally of the United States and Britain. If we were to think with our own minds instead of doing so with our enemies’ and adversaries’ minds, within our country and abroad, then we would surely at least maintain a decent, neutral and objective stance regarding the catastrophy unleashed on the Middle East over a century ago by the so-called “Western” powers. As a show of intellectual self-respect, we should not lightly accept the Official History regarding world events which is self-interestedly promoted and imposed by the US, Britain and Israel, at a time when we know practically nothing about that same history from the point-of-view of the nations that were catastrophically defeated in World War II. Naturally, we are not referring to the puppet governments that today exercise political power in Germany and Austria “by the grace of a tribal god” sitting in New York, London and Jerusalem, among other cosmopolitan cities.

Since 1945, world public opinion has been informed about the terrible murders, concentration camps and persecutions perpetrated by National Socialist Germany. However, this has been done within an unprecedented and unique framework in the history of mankind, in which one State (the German Third Reich) totally succumbed on the military front, and was left unarmed before its irreconcilable enemies (the United States, Britain, the Soviet Union and France), who then stole from Germany its territory, State structures and tried its political leadership (the illegal, obscene and fundamentally flawed Nuremberg Trials are an example of this). They robbed Germany of hundreds of thousands of patents, inventions, industrial processes and intellectual rights of all kinds, and – most importantly – they took from German all of their official State documentation, including top-secret papers; all as wartime booty.

That documentation was taken back to New York, London, Paris and Moscow from where, over the years, an “official history” was written reflecting the interests of the victorious allied forces. Among those future objectives and plans was the creation, financing and powerful militarization ad eternum of the State of Israel.

Let the reader imagine for a moment, what would happen if the world were to be able to access and study all the secret documents and files of, for example, the Unites States, Britain and Israel, because they fell completely into the hands of their enemies, who could then choose extracts from those documents and write their own “Official History” aimed at satanizing the US, Britain and Israel and promoting their own political agenda? Can the reader imagine the things that we would discover if we could thoroughly research the darkest, bloodiest, most perverse, pathological and destructive chapters hidden in the secret files of, say, the CIA, the Pentagon, and the National Security Agency of the United States? Or MI6 and the British Foreign Office? Or of the Mossad, Shin Beth and Israeli Defence Forces?

Today, in spite of all its power the Unites States cannot seem to manage maintaining a decent image with global public opinion, eben though they count with enormous instruments of control over global information and the media. Let us imagine for a second what Americans, Britons and Israelis would look like to global public opinion if they were to be thus shown naked to the world, as they have done with Germany since 1945… How many “Nuremberg Tribunals” would we have to set up to judge all the Kissingers, Trumans, Eisenhowers, Roosevelts, Bushs, Johnsons, McNamaras, Bundies, Kennans, Rusks, Baruchs, McBundys, Cheney, Perles, Wolfowitzs, Feiths, Rockefellers, Harrimans, Clintons, Eisenhowers, Albrights, Carluccis, Reagans, Hoovers, Westmorelands, Schwartzkopfs, Franks, Powells, Bradens, Rhodes, Kagans, Podhoretzs, Brzezinskis, Abrams, Negropontes, Boltons, Dulles, Rices, Rumsfelds, Bakers, Caseys, Bergers, Norths, Armitages, Lehmans, Albrights, Kaplans, Helms, Solardzs, Sokolskis, Thatchers, Churchills, D’Amatos, Nixons, Fords, Carters, Edens, Linowitzs, Carringtons, Notts, Harris, Shamirs, Meirs, Sharons, Netanyahus, Baraks, Peres, Gores, Beghins, Gurions, and many, so many more?? No doubt, the world would hold its breath in awe and shame, having never seen so many big fish being tried for war crimes and genocide causing so many millions upon millions of deaths.

This is why the cowardly systematic alignment of Argentina’s foreign and domestic policies over the past thirty years with the objectives, interests and plans of the owners of the New World Order led by the United States, Britain and Israel must stop.

This vulgar decadence intensified under President Carlos Menem’s treacherous administration during the nineties on all aspects of our national life and international relations, symbolized by the so-called “carnal relations” which Menem bonded with the Anglo-US-Israeli Empire, and which today continues unchanged under president Kirchner’s Administration, in spite of his left-wing and more vociferous style.

In the specific case of our relations with Iran, Argentina has wrongly accused Iran of being involved in the terrorist attacks against the AMIA and, implicitly, against the Israeli Embassy. Only false evidence to support that accusation was ever forthcoming; evidence obviously planted by Israeli and US forces who took over the on-site investigations at our two “Ground Zeros” (i.e., the Israeli Embassy and AMIA HQ) in Buenos Aires.

Thus, they worked hard for over a decade to invent a, by now obviously inexistent, “Iranian connection” to those terrorist attacks. This included such grotesque episodes as the one involving a pro-government federal judge giving a u$s 400.000 bribe to a prisoner so that he would give false testimony (i.e., suspended judge Eduardo Galeano) and, only a few weeks ago, we all saw on television a hysterical Argentine state prosecuter (Mr. Nissman) waving the photograph of the alleged suicide bomber in the AMIA explosion, but this too was quickly discarded when it was shown to be a vulgar and clumsy forgery. Naturally, all of the above occurred with high power media coverage by local newspapers, radios and television, as well as the international press (CNN, notably) all of them trying to show these maneouvers in as positive a way for Zionist interests as possible.

Today, they are still working hard to “find proof” supporting an alleged “Iranian connection” – and thus an “Iranian Trail” -, which is so much needed by US president George W. Bush and prime minister Ariel Sharon so that they can have yet a further excuse to attack Iran. What we really need, however, is a thorough investigation into the far more credible “Israeli Trail” regarding those two terrorist attacks (see Chap. VI of our essay “Bienvenidos a la Jungla…”, “Welcome to the Jungle”), reflecting the internal power struggle which is taking place inside Israel.

CABALISTIC NUMBERS…

In order to better understand how the mystification mechanisms regarding the six million actually works, let us share with our readers a similar action perpetrated on a much smaller scale and environment, and on a more recent case affecting our own country. We have here a similar process with the Myth of the “30.000 Disappeared” in Argentina, which is not only an inconsistent and unsupported figure, but the CONADEP – National Commission of Disappeared Persons created by the government of president Raúl Alfonsín in 1984 – in its report “Nunca Más” (“Nevermore”) ([10]) published twenty years ago, describes the existence of not more than 8.700 reported cases of people who allegedly “disappeared” during the military-civilian regime, whilst it only gathered concrete proof enabling the trial of responsible military personnel, on just a couple of hundred specific cases.

Even among this much smaller number of “disappeared” persons described by the CONADEP, we find notable cases of “disappeared” people who ended up appearing after all. Many of them were just exiled abroad, whilst others even ended turning up in high level Government posts, as is the case of Carmen Argibay, listed on the “Nunca Mas” report, who was recently appointed Supreme Court Judge by president Kirchner.

The important thing to point out is that here in Argentina, a propaganda machine was set in motion, powered by huge media and political interests repeating the Myth of 30.000 Disappeared Persons over and over and over again; drilling it into the brains of our citizens, until it became forceably integrated into Argentina’s collective psyche.

We mark this point as a way of emphasizing the importance of not allowing the “falsifying of reality” – to use Norberto Ceresole’s words quoted at the beginning of this article -, to prevail, which in NO way means justifying the barbarity, stupidity and treachery of the civilian-military regime which usurped power in our country between 1976 and 1983. All persons who committed crimes in that despicable and illegal government should pay, irrespective of whether they were Army Generals, Navy Admirals or Police Commissioners.

However, it is one thing to punish the individuals responsible for such crimes – especially since many of them were high-ranking military officers – and a very different thing to blame the entire institutions of Argentina’s Armed and Security Forces, vital for the defence, security and well-being of Argentina. Thus, a group of local and foreign characters have taken advantage of the terrible pain inflicted upon us during those years of turmoil to promote other inconfessable interests, aimed at achieving the step-by-step dissolution and destruction of Argentina. Seeing the sorrty state of our country today, one can only say that they have had a high degree of success, so much so that they have even planted one of their own as president of Argentina.

In moral terms, any human being unjustly imprisoned or killed deserves the fullest Justice, whether he was persecuted by the Argentine, German, US, Iraqi, Soviet or Israeli military, or by Chinese, Zionist, French or British fanatics. Justice, however, must be fair and for all, and not just for some. And if we are to try top Argentine military officers and German political leaders, then we should also judge Israeli and English torturers, as well as American invaders.

In short, the time has come to put things in their proper perspective: 6.000.000 dead Jews in the Holocaust? 30.000 Disappeared Persons in Argentina? Such unwarranted exagerations not only bring us no closer to Truth and Justice but, quite the contrary, they draw us away from Truth and away from Justice. They insult the very memory of those who were real victims of these complex conflicts and wars.

Let us therefore first generate an objective and balanced environment, allowing us to know the truth regarding these painful events and processes, so that we can later determine how many victims really perished and thus honor their memories, as we should honor the memory of all innocent victims of modern wars and strife. Today, it seems that this process works exactly backwards: first, false or unsubstantiated fantasy numbers and dramatizations are thrown on the media table with the view of creating a suitable Myth aligned to specific hidden agendas, and then pressure is brought on the world to force everyone to believe in them. The result of this is that we then have one further key victim: Truth itself.

We have said it many times before: if the Argentine people are to ever overcome the woes that afflict us, then the first thing we must do is to “understand and know what is actually happening” [11], which above all means “thinking with our own minds, instead of with our enemies’ minds”.

____________________

Adrian Salbuchi is researcher, author and speaker; host of the Buenos Aires talk-show “El Traductor Radial” and founder of the Argentine Second Republic Movement (Movimiento por la Segunda República Argentina) www.eltraductorradial.com.ar. He is author of various books in Spanish on international politics, notably, “El Cerebro del Mundo: la cara oculta de la Globalización” (Córdoba, Argentina, 4th Edition, 2003, 472 pages – translates as “The World’s Mastermind: the Hidden Face of Globalization”) and “Bienvenidos a la Jungla: Dominio y Supervivencia en el Nuevo Orden Mundial” (Ediciones Anábasis, Córdoba, Argentina, 2005, 252 pags – translates as “Welcome to the Jungle: Domination and Survival in the New World Order)”. This article is a translation of the original in Spanish, “La Falsificación de la Historia como Instrumento de Dominio”. Please direct all inquiries to eltraductorradial@fibertel.com.ar

[1] Nobel Peace Prize of 1986, member of the powerful Council on Foreign Relations, Inc., of New York, and Grand Master of the Holocaust Myth on a universal level. In 1980, Wiesel was appointed president of the American Council of the Holocaust Memorial by then US president Jimmy Carter (who in turn, is also member of the Council on Foreign Relations and David Rockefeller’s Trilateral Commission together with Zbigniew Brzezinski, Henry Kissinger and Maurice Greenberg, amongst many other powerful members of the Establishment). His web site is: www.eliewieselfoundation.org

[2] In 1935, Germany passed legislation which severely limited the civil liberties of Jews in that country, forbidding them to occupy public office and to practise various professions, even though they were allowed to continue with their business activities (only then can we explain the fact that over three years later, in October 1938, the Nazi Party could carry out the so-called “Cristal Night” when the windows of thousands of shops belonging to Jews in many German cities were smashed in protest over the assassination of the Attaché to the German Embassy in Paris at the hands of a Jew).

It is a remarkable fact that this legislation – the well known “Nuremberg Laws” of September 1935 – were based, amongst other things, on the legislation and racist state constitutions of the US States of Louisiana, Alabama, Mississippi, Georgia, South Carolina and Arkansas, as well as on racist Apartheid legislation in force in British South Africa, which had many decades before stripped their own black people of all civil liberties, practically leaving them in a state of slavery that would last for decades more after National Socialist Germany was defeated by the democratic forces of the United States and Britain. History has its funny turns sometimes…

[3] For more on this, please see the author’s book “Bienvenidos a la Jungla: Dominio y Supervivencia en el Nuevo Orden Mundial” (Ediciones Anábasis, Córdoba, Argentina, 2005, 252 pags), particularly Chap. VI, dealing with Zionism. This book’s title translates as “Welcome to the Jungle: Domination and Survival in the New World Order”. Suffice it to say that people tend to use both terms – Antisemitism and Antizionism – interchangeably without really understanding what they mean, for which reason the following should be kept in mind:

Antisemitism – Today, this term is used and abused to basically describe any form of criticism or attack whatsoever on Jewish activities anywhere in the world. This is both dangerouse and false. Dangerous, because when used as a weapon of intellectual terrorism, it acts as a buffer whereby nothing about Jewish activities can ever be criticized. This tends to place the Jews and their activities above the law of every land, especially in the powerful industrialized countries. False, because if the “Semites” are the descedents of the Biblical Shem (Noah’s eldest son), then only a part of the Jewish Peoples (the Sephardic communities) are themselves Semites, since the vast majority of Central European Ashkenazi Jews have little or no semitic blood in their veins. It is, in fact, the Arab peoples who are true descendents of Shem and who are therefore also “Semites”: Palestinians, Syrians, Lebanese, Iraquis, Egyptians, Lybians, Turks and Arab nations. Considering that such powerful Zionist Jews like Ariel Sharon, Benjamin Netanyahu, Elie Wiesel, Douglas Feith, Paul Wolfowitz and Ehud Barak are clearly of European stock – even Aryan if we use such outmoded 19th Century concepts as “Semitic” and “Aryan” to describe ethnic groups – and that millions of Palestinians who are prisoners in their own country are of “Semitic” stock, then today’s real “anti-Semitism”, if such is to be condemned by world public opinion, is the gross Antisemitism committed by the Israeli Defense Forces when they repress and torture the Palestinians. The assassination of tens – probably hundreds – of thousands of Iraquis by US and UK forces are yet a further pesent-day display of blatant Antisemitism practised by “Aryan” Israelis, Americans and Brits against the truly Semitic iraqui people.

Antizionism is, however another story. Zionism is a nationalistic, messianic, racist, fundamentalist and highly aggressive and powerful political movement founded in the 19th Century by such Jewish intellectuals as Theodore Herzl and Leo Pinsker, with clear aims and objectives not just in the Middle East, but in many other parts of the world as well.

Confusing both concepts as the friends of Israel nowadays do, represents a real travesty because not all Jews are Zionists (e.g. Noam Chomsky and Norman Finkelstein are Antizionists) and not all Zionists are Jews (e.g., George W Bush, Condoleeza Rice, Dick Cheney, Tony Blair, José Luis Aznar and Donald Rumsfeld to name but a few, are non Jewish fundamentalist Zionists).

[4] Quoted in the Buenos Aires daily newspaper “La Nación”, 09-Dec-05, article “Iran unleashes a new polemic by proposing that Israel be moved to Europe”. Also, the Madrid daily newspaper, “El País” of the same date: see article “Iran’s president suggests that Germany and Austria should house Israel”.

[5] Pages 105 to 113.

[6] In the specific case of Argentina, recent information from former French President Francois Mitterrand’s close entourage when he was Chief of State during the 1982 South Atlantic War over the Malvina-Falkland Islands between Argentina and the United Kingdom, indicates that then British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher considered the option of launching a nuclear bomb over the Argentine city of Córdoba (second largest city in our country with a population of around 1.5 million people), in the event that UK forces were to be defeated in their battle with Argentine forces which was taking place at that time in the cold waters of the South Atlantic.

Clearly, from the point of view of Argentine interests, we should not worry so much about Iran’s potential nuclear weapons, but rather we should be very much more concerned about real British nuclear bombs which are today deployed in their military bases in the Malvinas Islands, just a couple of hundred kilometres from our coasts.

[7] See “The New York Times”, 27th August 2002 – Article was written by US journalist Larry Rohter

[8] Rafael Bielsa was president Néstor Kirchner’s Minister of Foreign Affairs until he forced him into running for Deputy of Buenos Aires City in October 2005′s Congressional Elections, knowing that that was a very tough constituency. Mr. Bielsa came in third in the elections so, at the eleventh hour, Mr. Kirchner offered him to resign as Deputy to become Argentina’s Ambassador to France, which Mr. Bielsa promptly accepted only to change his mind 48 hours later after the public criticized him for this, and he finally accepted his post as Deputy. Mr. Kirchner then immediately named as new Ambassador to France a very young yet inexperienced left-wing intellectual, Eric Calcagno, without even asking for the French Government’s prior agreement…

[9] A group of military officers and civilians staged a Coup D’Etat on 24th March 1976 and their regime lasted until December 1983. They defeated the left-wing guerrillas using unacceptable means, and devastated the economy triggering the complex financial engineering leading to today’s huge Foreign Debt (the fact that Argentina’s foreign debt originated during that illegal military regime is of great consequence as it can be technically declared as “Odious Debt” under legislation in the US and the UK, even following the recent example set by the US condoning Iraq’s foreign debt originating in the Saddam Hussein regime as “Odious Debt”).

Argentina’s military were, in turn, seriously weakened following their defeat in the Malvinas-Falkland War in 1982 against the UK and the US, and they quickly handed power over to left-wing politicians who promptly arrested and tried them. Today, the very guerrilla leaders whom the armed forces defeated over twenty years ago, now sit in the Presidential Palace and in Congress in Buenos Aires, warmly described as “idealistic youths” by president Kirchner himself.

[10] Not surprisingly, the slogan “Nunca Más” is the literal translation of the same slogan – “Nevermore” – used at the start of the Holocaust Myth machine right after World War II

[11] “The people want to know what is happening” – El pueblo quiere saber de qué se trata – was one of the popular revolutionary cries during Argentina’s declaration of independence from Spain at the beginning of the 19th Century.

First published in the newsletter “Through the Looking Glass…”, No. 1 of 18-October-2006

Recomendar:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Blogplay
  • BarraPunto
  • Bitacoras.com
  • Meneame
  • RSS
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Twitter
Creative Commons

4 Respuestas to “Historical Lies as an Instrument of Domination”

Elie Wiesel vs Encyclopaedia Britannica

Wiesel has been a prominent spokesman for the very sizeable group of people known as Holocaust survivors. [According to Norman Finkelstein of the City University of New York in his book The Holocaust Industry published in 2000, ‘The Israeli Prime Minister’s office recently put the number of "living Holocaust survivors" at nearly a million’ (p.83)]. Wiesel has chaired the US Holocaust Memorial Council and has been the recipient of a Congressional Gold Medal and Nobel Peace Prize.

Time Magazine, March 18 1985:

‘How had he survived two of the most notorious killing fields [Auschwitz and Buchenwald] of the century? “I will never know” he says. “I was always weak. I never ate. The slightest wind would turn me over. In Buchenwald they sent 10,000 to their deaths every day. I was always in the last hundred near the gate. They stopped. Why?”

Compare this with Encyclopaedia Britannica (1993), under ‘Buchenwald’:

“In World War II it held about 20,000 prisoners.. Although there were no gas chambers, hundreds perished monthly through disease, malnutrition, exhaustion, beatings and executions.”

http://www.washington-report.org/backissues/0199/9901055.html

Washington Report on Middle East Affairs | January/February 1999

“A Terrible Fraud” :
Wiesel Ignores Palestinians
To the Jerusalem Post, Oct. 9, 1998 (as submitted).

(from Prof. Daniel McGowan, Professor of Economics at Hobart and William Smith Colleges, Geneva, NY)

In your Oct. 9 article on Elie Wiesel, the American icon of Holocaust survivors, he is paid a special tribute as a “speaker of truth.” This is the same Elie Wiesel who is continually referred to by Noam Chomsky and others as “a terrible fraud.” What can explain such disparity of opinion?

Perhaps it is because Wiesel, who has written literally volumes Against Silence, remains silent when it comes to such issues involving Palestinians as land expropriation, torture and abrogation of basic human rights.

Perhaps it is because Elie Wiesel proclaims with great piety that “the opposite of love is not hate; it is indifference,” while he remains totally indifferent to the inequality and suffering of the Palestinians. Perhaps it is because he enjoys recognition as “one of the first opponents of apartheid” in South Africa, while he remains totally silent and indifferent to the apartheid being practiced today in Israel.

Perhaps it is because he decries terrorism, yet never apologizes for the terrorism perpetrated by the Irgun at Deir Yassin on April 9, 1948. He refuses even to comment on it. He dismisses this act of terrorism in eight short words in his memoirs, All Rivers Run to the Sea. He remembers the Jewish victims at Kielce, Poland (July 1946) with great anguish, but ignores twice as many Palestinian victims of his own employer at Deir Yassin. The irony is breathtaking.

It is even more shocking that the world’s best known Holocaust survivor can repeatedly visit Yad Vashem and yet keep silent about the victims of Deir Yassin who lie within his sight 1,400 meters to the north. He bitterly protests when Jewish graves are defaced, but has nothing to say when the cemetery of Deir Yassin is bulldozed. He refuses even to acknowledge repeated requests that he join a group of Jews and non-Jews who wish to build a memorial at Deir Yassin.

Elie Wiesel may profess modesty and claim he is “not a symbol of anything” but, unfortunately, he has become a symbol of hypocrisy.

Daniel A. McGowan, Director, Deir Yassin Remembered, Geneva, NY

mcgowandaniel@yahoo.com

Jason on Junio 14th, 2009 at 5:33 pm

Interesting arithmetic

Have a look at a typical account by one of the seemingly endless number of survivors: Olga Lengyel’s Five Chimneys: a woman survivor’s true story of Auschwitz (Granada/ Ziff-Davis, 1947, 1972).

The blurb on the cover of the book quotes the New York Herald-Tribune: “Passionate, tormenting”. Albert Einstein, the promoter of the US construction of the bombs used at Hiroshima and Nagasaki, is quoted as offering “You have done a real service by letting the ones who are now silent and most forgotten (sic) speak.”

Lengyel says

‘After June, 1943, the gas chamber was reserved exclusively for Jews and Gypsies.. Three hundred and sixty corpses every half-hour, which was all the time it took to reduce human flesh to ashes, made 720 per hour, or 17,280 corpses per twenty-four hour shift. And the ovens, with murderous efficiency, functioned day and night. However, one must also reckon the death pits, which could destroy another 8,000 cadavers a day. In round numbers, about 24,000 corpses were handled each day. An admirable production record, one that speaks well for German industry.’ (Paperback edition, pp80-81). [No trace of any remains of or in ‘death pits’ has been found.]

This implies almost 100,000 corpses per four working days, or a million in 40 days, or six million in 240 days (eight months).

Could this claim be a misprint?

Kitty Hart, in spite of her name a Jewish survivor born in Poland, fully confirms these figures:

‘Working around the clock, the four units together could dispose of about 18,000 bodies every twenty-four hours, while the open pits coped with a further 8,000 in the same period.’ (p 118; Return to Auschwitz – paperback edition by Granada (1981, 1983).

According to the cover blurb, ‘The subject of the award-winning Yorkshire television documentary of the same name.’ ‘Both engaging and harrowing…an important addition to the growing holocaust literature, very little of which conveys so courageously both the daily torment and the will to survive’ – Martin Gilbert, The Times.

Martin Gilbert, indefatigable Jewish campaigner on behalf of the ‘Holocaust’ and biographer of Winston Churchill, adds to the rich flavour and makes his own numerical claims, certainly not without chutzpah:

In his book Auschwitz and the Allies (1981) he states

‘The deliberate attempt to destroy systematically all of Europe’s Jews was unsuspected in the spring and early summer of 1942: the very period during which it was at its most intense, and during which hundreds of thousands of Jews were being gassed every day at Belzec, Chelmo, Sobibor and Treblinka.’ (p.26).

If we assume a minimum figure of 200,000 per day, this amounts to say a million a five-day working week, or 6 million in six weeks, and this does not include the truly awe-inspiring claims for Auschwitz put forward by Hart and Lengyel with Gilbert’s blessing.

Jason on Junio 14th, 2009 at 5:34 pm

The Origins of World War 2 –
The unexpected views of four key diplomats who were close to events

Just consider the following:

Joseph P. Kennedy, U.S. Ambassador to Britain during the years immediately preceding WW2 was the father of the famous American Kennedy dynasty. James Forrestal the first US Secretary of Defense (1947-1949) quotes him as saying “Chamberlain (the British Prime Minister) stated that America and the world Jews had forced England into the war”. (The Forrestal Diaries ed. Millis, Cassell 1952 p129).

Count Jerzy Potocki, the Polish Ambassador in Washington, in a report to the Polish Foreign Office in January 1939, is quoted approvingly by the highly respected British military historian Major-General JFC Fuller. Concerning public opinion in America he says “Above all, propaganda here is entirely in Jewish hands…when bearing public ignorance in mind, their propaganda is so effective that people have no real knowledge of the true state of affairs in Europe… It is interesting to observe that in this carefully thought-out campaign… no reference at all is made to Soviet Russia. If that country is mentioned, it is referred to in a friendly manner and people are given the impression that Soviet Russia is part of the democratic group of countries… Jewry was able not only to establish a dangerous centre in the New World for the dissemination of hatred and enmity, but it also succeeded in dividing the world into two warlike camps…President Roosevelt has been given the power.. to create huge reserves in armaments for a future war which the Jews are deliberately heading for.” (Fuller, JFC: The Decisive Battles of the Western World vol 3 pp 372-374.)

Hugh Wilson, the American Ambassador in Berlin until 1938, the year before the war broke out, found anti-Semitism in Germany ‘understandable’. This was because before the advent of the Nazis, “the stage, the press, medicine and law [were] crowded with Jews…among the few with money to splurge, a high proportion [were] Jews…the leaders of the Bolshevist movement in Russia, a movement desperately feared in Germany, were Jews. One could feel the spreading resentment and hatred.” (Hugh Wilson: Diplomat between the Wars, Longmans 1941, quoted in Leonard Mosley, Lindbergh, Hodder 1976).

Sir Nevile Henderson, British Ambassador in Berlin ‘said further that the hostile attitude in Great Britain was the work of Jews and enemies of the Nazis, which was what Hitler thought himself’ (Taylor, AJP: The Origins of the Second World War Penguin 1965, 1987 etc p 324).

Is all of this merely attributable to antisemitism?

The economic background to the war is necessary for a fuller understanding, before casting judgement on the originators of these viewpoints.

At the end of the First World War, Germany was essentially tricked [see Paul Johnson A History of the Modern World (1983) p24 and H Nicholson Peacemaking 1919 (1933) pp13-16] into paying massive reparations to France and other economic competitors and former belligerent countries in terms of the so-called Treaty of Versailles, thanks to the liberal American President Woodrow Wilson. Germany was declared to be solely responsible for the war, in spite of the fact that ‘Germany did not plot a European war, did not want one, and made genuine efforts, though too belated, to avert one.’ (Professor Sydney B Fay The Origins of the World War (vol. 2 p 552)).

As a result of these massive enforced financial reparations, by 1923 the situation in Germany became desperate and inflation on an astronomical scale became the only way out for the government. Printing presses were engaged to print money around the clock. In 1921 the exchange rate was 75 marks to the dollar. By 1924 this had become about 5 trillion marks to the dollar. This virtually destroyed the German middle class (Koestler The God that Failed p 28), reducing any bank savings to a virtual zero.

According to Sir Arthur Bryant the British historian (Unfinished Victory (1940 pp. 136-144):

‘It was the Jews with their international affiliations and their hereditary flair for finance who were best able to seize such opportunities.. They did so with such effect that, even in November 1938, after five years of anti-Semitic legislation and persecution, they still owned, according to the Times correspondent in Berlin, something like a third of the real property in the Reich. Most of it came into their hands during the inflation.. But to those who had lost their all this bewildering transfer seemed a monstrous injustice. After prolonged sufferings they had now been deprived of their last possessions. They saw them pass into the hands of strangers, many of whom had not shared their sacrifices and who cared little or nothing for their national standards and traditions.. The Jews obtained a wonderful ascendancy in politics, business and the learned professions (in spite of constituting) less than one percent of the population.. The banks, including the Reichsbank and the big private banks, were practically controlled by them. So were the publishing trade, the cinema, the theatres and a large part of the press – all the normal means, in fact, by which public opinion in a civilized country is formed.. The largest newspaper combine in the country with a daily circulation of four millions was a Jewish monopoly.. Every year it became harder and harder for a gentile to gain or keep a foothold in any privileged occupation.. At this time it was not the ‘Aryans’ who exercised racial discrimination. It was a discrimination that operated without violence. It was exercised by a minority against a majority. There was no persecution, only elimination.. It was the contrast between the wealth enjoyed – and lavishly displayed – by aliens of cosmopolitan tastes, and the poverty and misery of native Germans, that has made anti-Semitism so dangerous and ugly a force in the new Europe. Beggars on horseback are seldom popular, least of all with those whom they have just thrown out of the saddle.’

Goodness gracious, Sir Arthur! What made you get out of the wrong side of the bed?

Strangely enough, a book unexpectedly published by Princeton University Press in 1984, Sarah Gordon (Hitler, Germans and the “Jewish Question”) essentially confirms what Bryant says. According to her, ‘Jews were never a large percentage of the total German population; at no time did they exceed 1% of the population during the years 1871-1933.’ But she adds ‘Jews were over-represented in business, commerce, and public and private service.. They were especially visible in private banking in Berlin, which in 1923 had 150 private Jewish banks, as opposed to only 11 private non-Jewish banks.. They owned 41% of iron and scrap iron firms and 57% of other metal businesses.. Jews were very active in the stock market, particularly in Berlin, where in 1928 they comprised 80% of the leading members of the stock exchange. By 1933, when the Nazis began eliminating Jews from prominent positions, 85% of the brokers on the Berlin Stock exchange were dismissed because of their “race”.. At least a quarter of full professors and instructors (at German universities) had Jewish origins.. In 1905-6 Jewish students comprised 25% of the law and medical students.. In 1931, 50% of the 234 theatre directors in Germany were Jewish, and in Berlin the number was 80%.. In 1929 it was estimated that the per capita income of Jews in Berlin was twice that of other Berlin residents..’ etc etc.

Arthur Koestler confirms the Jewish over-involvement in German publishing. ‘Ullstein’s was a kind of super-trust; the largest organization of its kind in Europe, and probably In the world. They published four daily papers in Berlin alone, among these the venerable Vossische Zeitung, founded in the eighteenth century, and the B.Z. am Mittag, an evening paper.. Apart from these, Ullstein’s published more than a dozen weekly and monthly periodicals, ran their own news service, their own travel agency, etc., and were one of the leading book publishers. The firm was owned by the brothers Ullstein – they were five, like the original Rothschild brothers, and like them also, they were Jews.’ (The God that Failed (1950) ed. RHS Crossman, p 31).

Edgar Mowrer, Berlin correspondent for the Chicago Daily News, wrote an anti-German tract called Germany Puts the Clock Back (published as a Penguin Special and reprinted five times between December 1937 and April 1938). He nevertheless notes ‘In the all-important administration of Prussia, any number of strategic positions came into the hands of Hebrews.. A telephone conversation between three Jews in Ministerial offices could result in the suspension of any periodical or newspaper in the state.. The Jews came in Germany to play in politics and administration that same considerable part that they had previously won by open competition in business, trade, banking, the Press, the arts, the sciences and the intellectual and cultural life of the country. And thereby the impression was strengthened that Germany, a country with a mission of its own, had fallen into the hands of foreigners.’

Mowrer says ‘No one who lived through the period from 1919 to 1926 is likely to forget the sexual promiscuity that prevailed.. Throughout a town like Berlin, hotels and pensions made vast fortunes by letting rooms by the hour or day to baggageless, unregistered guests. Hundreds of cabarets, pleasure resorts and the like served for purposes of getting acquainted and acquiring the proper mood..’ (pp. 153-4). Bryant describes throngs of child prostitutes outside the doors of the great Berlin hotels and restaurants. He adds ‘Most of them (the night clubs and vice-resorts) were owned and managed by Jews. And it was the Jews.. among the promoters of this trade who were remembered in after years.’ (pp. 144-5).

Douglas Reed, Chief Central European correspondent before WWII for the London Times, was profoundly anti-German and anti-Hitler. But nevertheless he reported: ‘I watched the Brown Shirts going from shop to shop with paint pots and daubing on the window panes the word “Jew”, in dripping red letters. The Kurfürstendamm was to me a revelation. I knew that Jews were prominent in business life, but I did not know that they almost monopolized important branches of it. Germany had one Jew to one hundred gentiles, said the statistics; but the fashionable Kurfürstendamm, according to the dripping red legends, had about one gentile shop to ninety-nine Jewish ones.’ (Reed Insanity Fair (1938) p. 152-3). In Reed’s book Disgrace Abounding of the following year he notes ‘In the Berlin (of pre-Hitler years) most of the theatres were Jewish-owned or Jewish-leased, most of the leading film and stage actors were Jews, the plays performed were often by German, Austrian or Hungarian Jews and were staged by Jewish film producers, applauded by Jewish dramatic critics in Jewish newspapers.. The Jews are not cleverer than the Gentiles, if by clever you mean good at their jobs. They ruthlessly exploit the common feeling of Jews, first to get a foothold in a particular trade or calling, then to squeeze the non-Jews out of it.. It is not true that Jews are better journalists than Gentiles. They held all the posts on those Berlin papers because the proprietors and editors were Jewish’ (pp238-9).

The Jewish writer Edwin Black notes ‘For example, in Berlin alone, about 75% of the attorneys and nearly as many of the doctors were Jewish.’ (Black, The Transfer Agreement (1984) p58.

To cap it all, Jews were perceived as dangerous enemies of Germany after Samuel Untermeyer, the leader of the World Jewish Economic Federation, declared war on Germany on August 6 1933. (Edwin Black The Transfer Agreement: the Untold Story of the Secret Pact between the Third Reich and Palestine (1984) pp272-277) According to Black, ‘The one man who most embodied the potential death blow to Germany was Samuel Untermeyer.’ (p 369). This was the culmination of a worldwide boycott of German goods led by international Jewish organizations. The London Daily Express on March 24, 1933 carried the headline Judea Declares War on Germany. The boycott was particularly motivated by the German imposition of the Nuremberg Laws, which ironically were similar in intent and content to the Jewish cultural exclusivism practiced so visibly in present-day Israel (Hannah Arendt Eichmann in Jerusalem p 7).

Hitler saw the tremendous danger posed to Germany by Communism. He appreciated the desperate need to eliminate this threat, a fact that earned him the immense hatred and animosity of the Jewish organisations and the media and politicians of the west which they could influence. After all, according to the Jewish writer Chaim Bermant, although Jews formed less than five percent of Russia’s population, they formed more than fifty percent of its revolutionaries. According to the Jewish writer Chaim Bermant in his book The Jews (1977, chapter 8):

‘It must be added that most of the leading revolutionaries who convulsed Europe in the final decades of the last century and the first decades of this one, stemmed from prosperous Jewish families.. They were perhaps typified by the father of revolution, Karl Marx.. Thus when, after the chaos of World War I, revolutions broke out all over Europe, Jews were everywhere at the helm; Trotsky, Sverdlov, Kamenev and Zinoviev in Russia, Bela Kun in Hungary, Kurt Eisner in Bavaria, and, most improbable of all, Rosa Luxemburg in Berlin.

‘To many outside observers, the Russian revolution looked like a Jewish conspiracy, especially when it was followed by Jewish-led revolutionary outbreaks in much of central Europe. The leadership of the Bolshevik Party had a preponderance of Jews.. Of the seven members of the Politburo, the inner cabinet of the country, four, Trotsky (Bronstein), Zinoviev (Radomsky), Kamenev (Rosenfeld) and Sverdlov, were Jews.’ Other authors agree with this:

“There has been a tendency to circumvent or simply ignore the significant role of Jewish intellectuals in the German Communist Party, and thereby seriously neglect one of the genuine and objective reasons for increased anti-Semitism during and after World War 1.. The prominence of Jews in the revolution and early Weimar Republic is indisputable, and this was a very serious contributing cause for increased anti-Semitism in post-war years.. It is clear then that the stereotype of Jews as socialists and communists.. led many Germans to distrust the Jewish minority as a whole and to brand Jews as enemies of the German nation.” (Sarah Gordon Hitler, Germans and the ‘Jewish Question’ Princeton University Press (1984) p 23).

“The second paroxysm of strong anti-Semitism came after the critical role of Jews in International Communism and the Russian Revolution and during the economic crises of the 1920s and 30s… Anti-Semitism intensified throughout Europe and North America following the perceived and actual centrality of Jews in the Russian Revolution.. Such feelings were not restricted to Germany, or to vulgar extremists like the Nazis. All over Northern Europe and North America, anti-Semitism became the norm in ‘nice society’, and ‘nice society’ included the universities.” (Martin Bernal, Black Athena vol. 1 pp. 367, 387).

“The major role Jewish leaders played in the November (Russian) revolution was probably more important than any other factor in confirming (Hitler’s) anti-Semitic beliefs.” (J&S Pool, Who Financed Hitler, p.164).

Hitler came to power in Germany with two main aims, the rectification of the unjust provisions of the Versailles Treaty, and the destruction of the Soviet/ Communist threat to Germany. Strangely enough, contrary to the mythology created by those who had an opposing ethnic agenda, he had no plans or desire for a larger war of conquest. Professor AJP Taylor showed this in his book The Origins of the Second World War, to the disappointment of the professional western political establishment. Taylor says, “The state of German armament in 1939 gives the decisive proof that Hitler was not contemplating general war, and probably not intending war at all” (p.267), and “Even in 1939 the German army was not equipped for a prolonged war; and in 1940 the German land forces were inferior to the French in everything except leadership” (p104-5). What occurred in Europe in 1939-41 was the result of unforeseen weaknesses and a tipping of the balance of power, and Hitler was an opportunist ‘who took advantages whenever they offered themselves’ (Taylor). Britain and France declared war on Germany, not the other way around. Hitler wanted peace with Britain, as the German generals admitted (Basil Liddell Hart, The Other Side of the Hill 1948, Pan Books 1983) with regard to the so-called Halt Order at Dunkirk, where Hitler had the opportunity to capture the entire British Army, but chose not to. Liddell Hart, one of Britain’s most respected military historians, quotes the German General von Blumentritt with regard to this Halt Order:

“He (Hitler) then astonished us by speaking with admiration of the British Empire, of the necessity for its existence, and of the civilisation that Britain had brought into the world. He remarked, with a shrug of the shoulders, that the creation of its Empire had been achieved by means that were often harsh, but ‘where there is planing, there are shavings flying’. He compared the British Empire with the catholic Church – saying they were both essential elements of stability in the world. He said that all he wanted from Britain was that she should acknowledge Germany’s position on the Continent. The return of Germany’s colonies would be desirable but not essential, and he would even offer to support Britain with troops if she should be involved in difficulties anywhere..” (p 200).

According to Liddell Hart, “At the time we believed that the repulse of the Luftwaffe in the ‘Battle over Britain’ had saved her. That is only part of the explanation, the last part of it. The original cause, which goes much deeper, is that Hitler did not want to conquer England. He took little interest in the invasion preparations, and for weeks did nothing tospur them on; then, after a brief impulse to invade, he veered around again and suspended the preparations. He was preparing, instead, to invade Russia” (p140).

David Irving in the foreword to his book The Warpath (1978) refers to “the discovery.. that at no time did this man (Hitler) pose or intend a real threat to Britain or the Empire.”

This gives a completely different complexion, not only to the war, but to the successful suppression of this information during the war and afterwards. Historians today know only too well where the boundaries lie within which they can paint their pictures of the war and its aftermath, and the consequences of venturing beyond those boundaries, irrespective of the evidence. Unfortunately, only too few of them have been prepared to have the courage to break out of this dreadful straitjacket of official and unofficial censorship.

E-mail comment received:

I worked and studied in Berlin for three years, have an MA in International Relations and a BA in Government with a minor in History. I am embarrassed to say that until I read this article, I had no idea of the scope and cause for the anti-Semitism in Germany before WWII. The Halt Order at Dunkirk was never mentioned in my studies, nor was the ownership of the media, banks and businesses.

Thank you for the excellent article. It certainly gives me a new perspective. I have always questioned the actual numbers of Jewish victims of the concentration camps, as the numbers didn’t make sense based upon Germany’s population. Perhaps it was fear of failing or being labeled an anti-Semite by my history professors (all but two were Jewish) and classmates that I refrained from demanding an honest discussion during my classes. I once said that the only reason Israel existed was out of Holocaust guilt, and I was immediately labeled a terrorist sympathizer.

I see what is now happening in Israel and I am aghast. The parallels to WW II are frightening. Even today, one cannot bring up this subject without being labeled a Holocaust denier or white supremacist.

Thanks again for an excellent article. I am forwarding it to several friends.

JBP

Jason on Junio 14th, 2009 at 5:36 pm

It’s now official – there’s no actual shortage of Holocaust survivors:

‘The Israeli Prime Minister’s office recently put the number of “living Holocaust survivors” at nearly a million’ (extract from The Holocaust Industry by Norman G. Finkelstein of the City University of New York, published by Verso, London and New York, 2000, p.83).

I’ve checked out Churchill’s Second World War and the statement is quite correct – not a single mention of Nazi ‘gas chambers,’ a ‘genocide’ of the Jews, or of ‘six million’ Jewish victims of the war.
Eisenhower’s Crusade in Europe is a book of 559 pages; the six volumes of Churchill’s Second World War total 4,448 pages; and De Gaulle’s three-volume Mémoires de guerre is 2,054 pages.

In this mass of writing, which altogether totals 7,061 pages (not including the introductory parts), published from 1948 to 1959, one will find no mention either of Nazi ‘gas chambers,’ a ‘genocide’ of the Jews, or of ‘six million’ Jewish victims of the war.

Jason on Junio 14th, 2009 at 5:37 pm

Dejar una Respuesta

Debes estar registrado para comentar.