About “anti-Semitism”

Discrimination based on race, religion, nationality, ideology, public opinion, fortune, social or physical features, is a scourge that must be fought by the whole society and all the elements at your fingertips. That in a civilized men and women being segregated, assaulted or harassed for such reasons is, simply, unacceptable.
Clearly, the best way to combat discrimination in all its forms is more education and greater awareness among the public so you can stay always alert not only to gross and flagrant manifestations of discrimination, but also to more subtle cases, So, most corrosive. The latter are often based on fallacies and distortions expressed with great hypocrisy, often covered up and ignored the aims and interests pursuing specific groups and organizations.
Also note that if in any community is important that no minority is discriminated against by the majority, No less vital is that most do not fall victim of discrimination and aggression by a powerful minority.
This is particularly relevant for Argentina, sad country that has known episodes in which minorities vast undemocratic discrimination perpetrated against the Argentine people, as occurred between 1976 and 1983 when a compact civil-military regime seized power.
Within this framework, This essay addresses one of the most complex phenomena, confused and distorted on declaims that much but little is understood: the so-called “anti-Semitism”.

By way of introduction
Technological advances applied to the communications and media, they have to charge a power unprecedented in human history.
The combined effect and the mutual feedback of the mass media – graphic press, radio, TV, Internet and other – now allowed to form, influence, and also to distort, collective perception of reality in all areas of life. This we can see from the fields of politics, economy, finance, sociology, culture and religion, where there is a large and growing fundamental reversal of ethical and moral values, as well as in applications, good customs and traditions of the peoples of the world.
As a process of psychological warfare – because it is – its implementation has been gradual and dynamic, to achieve increased habituation in the community, taking long-term goals spanning generations. Viewed as a whole, the past century bears eloquent testimony to what is stated, when we see the profound changes over the same.
The Argentina is no stranger to the phenomenon described. On the contrary, our country seems to be among the nations elected as a kind of laboratory for experimentation aimed at gradually change, distort or even reverse their ethical and moral values, religious beliefs, and ideological alignments. In order, axes are disrupting the collective imagination that is based on what has been termed the “argentinidad”; or, the set of ideas, styles, symbols and myths that identify us as a nation and as an organized community in the broadest sense of the concept.
It should be noted that while multimedia is the visible face that drives this phenomenon psychological action, motive force but not immediately visible that sustains and finances, usually lies between entities and individuals who invariably have very specific goals and interests. Over more than thirty years, Argentina on one of these goals – achieved by some – has been to weaken, disrupt and undermine the National State in their vital functions and delegated. In terms of what we might call “the soul of our nation”, those functions of government should focus on their duty to represent and defend the authentic cultural values, ethical, moral, religious, social and political factors for almost five centuries nourished communities living in these lands.
We note that many psychological aspects of collective action promoted by the media – which often takes characteristics of intellectual terrorism reminiscent of the crudest Stalinist Soviet times – forms a sort of silent psychological warfare waged against the citizens' mental health, ergo, against the collective psychology of our people. Some have been called “War discreet with silent weapons”
As we, this phenomenon is not accidental or spontaneous. Obey clear objectives and interests, the most often non-explicit, who promote them because you know that if they spoke bluntly, would be exposed the fact that their goals tend to weaken the spiritual fiber of our community, demoralize large segments of our people, confuse our youth and corrupting the morals.
So if the public take these objectives fully aware of undercover, above, are intimately linked to the interests of foreign powers and supranational organizations mostly in the national interest Argentino, then surely there would be a collective reaction against size vehement attack.
Hence it can be understood that this psychological war of planetary scope free silently, From “behind the scenes”, as expressed brilliantly for over a century Benjamin Disraeli, that great British prime minister of Queen Victoria.
Serve this brief introduction to set the conceptual framework within which to address the issue at hand: the so-called “anti-Semitism”.

The psychological action
Action psychological warfare – also known as “advertisement” -, it can identify as a set of characteristics that betray a clear methodology aimed to persuade and convince a segment of the population, or all of it, about what is good or bad any idea or proposal, so that those sectors of the population then adopt certain patterns of behavior with a high degree of automaticity.
Then and in the style of the famous Pavlov's dog experiment( ), will be activated only some symbol, image, a word or a sound to trigger a large complex of behaviors previously recorded and programmed into the unconscious of the psyche of the white population.
Correspondingly, from any exercise of psychological warfare he is widely recognized by certain characteristics, such as repetition, simplification, the impossibility of verifying their veracity, contradiction and – in some cases – its outright irrationality:
• Repeat – The psychological action requires repeat again and again the idea, image or perceived “truth” which seeks to impose on the collective psyche, drilling in the brains of the white population it is aimed to. Its primary goal is to conditional reflexes certain style “Pavlov's dog”, albeit with greater sophistication and subtlety. It applies so the old saying attributed to Joseph Goebbels: “lies, lies, something always lies be…”
• simplification – The psychological action requires a high degree of unilateralism, implying ad absurdum simplify extremely complex issues and processes, in which there can never be a single truth. This is the game “black or white”, excluding – prohibits, even – whole range of “gray” intermediate. Fracture subjects for discussion in a Manichaean opposition between “good and bad”, where “good” always win. When it comes to warring parties, we learn that the “good” win just because they exert more violence, death and blood (but, Not have won!). We ran well with the unacceptable contradiction that “good” are always those people who carry greater amounts of physical violence with which neutralize and annihilate the “ill”. Applied to politics, history and scope of ideas, clearly we are facing what many call the version “Walt Disney” reality, sanititarizada suitably simplified for mass consumption until infantilism. His trademarks are the fanaticism, dogmatism and intellectual terrorism, that does not tolerate and neutralize for every opinion contrary to the very. This would explain the “logic” behind the threat posed to the four winds by George W. Bush after the attacks of 11 September 2001: “From now, each nation must decide if he's with us or against us…”
• Inverificabilidad – The action is often based on myths psychological conveniently taxes through repetition, thus determines the collective imagination of a community is thus obliged to accept them as “Truth”, despite the fact that not only is there firm evidence that the endorsement but, even, often the visible evidence shows the opposite. Accusations 2002/2003 Bush administration against Saddam Hussein's regime in Iraq's alleged possession of “WMD” forms a striking example, because it was a political lie propagated from the highest level U.S. government, that has already cost more than 1.200.000 Iraqi deaths, love of several thousands of deaths among the invading forces, and literally tens of millions of casualties on all sides.( )
• Contradiction – The psychological action often proclaim one thing and then push the exact opposite of what he recites. Thus, is imposed “democracy” in politics, but de-democratize the economy and finance. It promotes “peace”, but today the big powers are spending more on weapons than at any other time in history. He recites the protection of “human rights”, but these rights have never been so violated as in the terrible times we live. They talk about the “freedom”, but perpetrate illegal and unwarranted military occupation of Afghanistan as, Palestine, Iraq e.
• Irrationality – If concepts like “democracy”, “peace”, “human rights” and “freedom” have been largely emptied of their real meaning, More complex is the case of the word “anti-Semitism” than – see below – now often used in a way that can only be described as irrational ( ). Using techniques of psychological warfare, the word “anti-Semitism” he has transferred an enormous amount of negative emotionality, because its true sense to divert, it is used to generate feelings of compassion and solidarity groups and Jewish organizations, out of proportion, logic and real need. It has reached the point that today be called a “antisemitic” or promoting the “anti-Semitism” forms a real grievance, insult and disqualification for that person, institution or nation that looks like scheduled. Be classified “antisemitic” is almost as bad as being issued “nazi”, “fascist”, “mafioso” or murderer. Nobody in their right mind and right conduct, may agree to be qualified in such a way.

Confucianism
We begin by noting that among the techniques of psychological warfare unleashed around “anti-Semitism”, has an important place that promotes confusion deliberately aimed mix – confuse – four categories very distinct:
1. Judaism, as ancient religion;
2. Jewish ethnicity, as a social community scattered in many countries around the world, whose members are certain cultural characteristics, social and religious, but differ – often sharply – in its ideological and political alignments;
3. Zionism, nationalist political ideology integrated as a powerful global network of pressure, shock and lobby, fully aligned to the interests of the State of Israel( );
4. The State of Israel, as a national political entity installed in a particular geography;
We emphasize that arbitrarily and unjustly, Zionist organizations often assume the representativeness of the entire Jewish people – among which there are many anti-Zionist Jews who identify little, even nothing, with the State of Israel – falsely claiming that those who oppose Zionism are therefore “Semitic”.
Thus, whenever there is any criticism of their actions, shield themselves saying that, attacking or Judaism as a religion, or the Jewish people as ethnic, when in fact that today millions of people move to the scandal are the policies of systematic state terrorism practiced by Israel against Palestine and Lebanon, and the improper and unlawful interference of powerful Zionist organizations in the internal affairs of other nations, Argentina include.
Let us be clear:
• It is an overriding obligation in any civilized nation to oppose discrimination on grounds of religion or ethnicity. The issue at hand, discrimination is unacceptable to Judaism as a religion, or the Jews as a people of peace within our community; However, Also:
• It is an inalienable right of all free-thinking citizen to criticize and expose the genocidal policies of any State that practices, and racist ideologies and exclusionary. In the case, must defend the right to evaluate and comment on broad public discussions, open and respectful of the goodness – or lack thereof – policies of the State of Israel and the proposals and consequences of the Zionist ideology, both for the world as for Argentina
In our country, Law 23.592 – discrimination – is specific and clear about: prohibits discrimination on grounds such as race, religion, nationality, ideology, public opinion or union, fortune, social or physical features. Notably, the so-called “anti-Semitism” not even mentioned in the Act, This reflects the lack of a rational definition of that, as we have demonstrated in this trial.
Those who hide behind accusations – often grossly vehement – the “anti-Semitism”, intended to mislead a nonexistent race discrimination, religion or nationality, when in reality it circumvents large sectors of the local and international public opinion critical, is a set of political and ideological beliefs in the service of lobbying organizations and supranational shock – Zionist organizations -, and for a foreign power point: The State of Israel.

“anti-Semitism”
Las definiciones tradicionales indican ( ):
• Antisemitismo: Doctrine or trend of anti-Semites.
• anti-Semitic: adj. and com. [Solo] hostile toward Jews, or to the culture and influence of these
• Antisemítico: adj. Anti-Semitism or related to this doctrine:
These definitions are too incomplete and ambiguous. We intend, then, start at the beginning saying, first, you can not be “anti” something, he will first define this “something”. So to define the “anti-Semitism”, we must first know what are the “Semitism”, the Semitic and the Semitic.
“Semite” comes from Shem who, according to the Old Testament, was the first son of Noah from whom descend the Hebrews, Assyrians, Babylonians, the Elamite, the Canaanites, and Arab peoples in the Middle East today: Lebanese, Iraqi, Syrian, Jordanian, Egyptian and Palestinian, among others. Indeed, the term “Semite” inception in the nineteenth century to describe a linguistic category, or to designate the Semitic-speaking peoples and their cultures. Despite lacking any ethnic basis – as was the case with the term “ario” popularized by Count Arthur de Gobineau in his essay “On the Inequality of Human Races” (1855) – voice “Semite” mutated to have a linguistic meaning, acquiring a new meaning pseudo-racial, because there are no “races” within the category that conforms homo sapiens, itself, a single race: human -. So “Semite” at most can be used to describe an ethnic or language, but not satisfied any “race”.
Well defined the broad meaning of the term “Semite”, then we see that its counterpart – “antisemitic” – should define who oppose the influence and culture of the Semitic. or, it would be mostly Arabs and the majority religion of Islam, and only a very small sector of the Jewish people (or, Sephardic Jews whose descendants can be traced to the biblical Hebrews).
Within the framework of this definition, persecution and attacks perpetrated today against the Semitic peoples in Iraq, Lebanon and Palestine must be classed as anti-Semitic genocide; or real cases of anti-Semitism. Especially when you consider that the powers that perpetrate – United States, Britain and the State of Israel – consist, at least in its top leadership, by political leaders who have little or nothing of “Semitic”. On the contrary: when we observe the physical characteristics of political leaders like George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, Ehud Olmert, Ariel Sharon, Benjamin Netanyahu, Tony Blair, Richard Perle, John Negroponte, Douglas Feith, Richard Armitage, Paul Bremer III, Avigdor Lieberman, Donald Rumsfeld, Gordon Brown, Ehud Barak, y Tzipi Livni, to name just a few, prove that it is of Caucasian individuals – “arios” as would Gobineau. The most notable exceptions are Condoleeza Rice and Colin Powell who, Clearly, are neither Aryans nor Semites…
But we all know that when the multimedia world and talk about the Zionist organizations “anti-Semitism”, in no way relate to the systematic violence perpetrated against the Semitic peoples in the Middle East by the Western democracies. Incongruentemente, “anti-Semitism” can only be used to describe opposition to the policies and actions of the Jewish community which, however, as discussed below, carries only a small portion of “Semitic blood”.
In conclusion:
• In the atmosphere of psychological war prevailing today, “anti-Semitism” not be used to describe the reality, or concrete and verifiable violence perpetrated against the Semitic peoples (Arabs in Iraq, Palestinian Territory, Lebanon and Afghanistan, between gold), but only can be used to qualify a misunderstanding: the alleged opposition to the Jewish people (only minimally Semitic) and religion, while it covers large sections of world public opinion is critical of the ideology of Zionism and the internal and external policies of the State of Israel.
• Even, one hand while being misused word of great power – “anti-Semitism” – to describe and identify any person who opposes the power of Zionism and the State of Israel, no existe, However, no word of similar potency and negative to describe and identify the aggressions perpetrated by Zionism and the State of Israel against various people, peoples and organizations.
Clearly, this is a riddle that can only be explained if one understands the reasons to be imposed by blood and fire inconsistent and distorted the definition of “anti-Semitism”.
Already the father of the Zionist world movement, Theodor Herzl, said in his founding 1896, “The Jewish State”, than “modern anti-Semitism should not be confused with the religious persecution of Jews that once existed. Occasionally making piping religious discrimination in some countries but the mainstream of this aggressive move today has changed. In the main countries in the prevailing anti-Semitism, the same is the result of the emancipation of the Jews”.
Herzl then adds something very important in the historical context related to the emergence of “anti-Semitism” in the twentieth century, saying “when we sink, us into the revolutionary, subordinate officers of all revolutionary parties; while also arises when we exalted the terrible power of the wallet. & #8221; Those statements can be drawn some conclusions about the evolution, both of communism and its violent revolution in the first half of the twentieth century, plutocratic capitalism and the gigantic power which remains intact to this day.

The Jews, ¿Son Semitic?
Here can be raised then a fundamental question is whether Jews themselves can they be described as “Semitic”, so you can even determine if it is defined as “anti-Semitism” any opposition to their goals, interests or actions. remarkably, portion of individuals genuinely Semites among Jewish communities worldwide, and especially in the State of Israel, appears to be relatively low.
This is because only the Sephardic Jews can claim a probable descent from the ancient Semitic-testamentary. However, Sephardic Jews constitute a numerical minority and relatively low representation and influence within the Jewish power structures, both in the State of Israel and the Diaspora.
It should be noted that most of the Jews in the State of Israel, as in Europe, U.S. and Argentina, are of Ashkenazim( ). Ultimately, Ashkenazim are descended from the Khazars, Eurasian people of Caucasian origin in the centuries VII, VIII and IX was able to form a vast empire magnificent but highly decentralized because it is a highly nomadic people.
The Khazars were ruled by a king named generically Khagan, in the eighth century who realized that the main threat that hung over his people was to be assimilated by either of the two political empires, military and cultural Eurasia at the time: on one hand, the Christian Eastern Roman Empire ruled from Byzantium and, on the other, The Islamic Caliphate in Baghdad.
Weaving a complex web of political marriages, the Khazars were able to insert into the decadent Byzantine, but they always chose to maintain their proud independence, one pillar of which was never not been subordinated or Byzantine Christianity and Islam, knowing at the time that religion was a factor of great importance to political and social.
Thus Khazars kings from his citadel in the city of Itil the shores of the Caspian Sea, took a revolutionary step, historically unprecedented, single: in the year 740AD, the Khazars were converted en masse to Judaism as a strategy to curb the dangerous Christian and Muslim pressure.
With the passage of many centuries, the decline of the empire kazar, the fall of Byzantium, and the strengthening of Islam, the descendants of the nomadic Khazars expanded into Russia, Ukraine, Belarus, Poland and entered the Central and Western Europe through Romania and Germany coming to have significant presence in many major cities in Europe. Where were the Khazars, carrying with them the religion of Moses.
Conclusion: Ashkenazim Jews – mostly blond, bright eyes, skinned, and often redheads (Authentic “arios” say those who subscribe to the outdated theories of Gobineau) little or nothing to do with the Hebrews and Israelites of the Bible. or, little or no blood “Semite” flowing through their veins, and little historic or ethnic grounds have to claim as their own to the Holy Land Canaanite.
Not so the minority Sephardic Jews, who can at least wield a probable descendants of the biblical Hebrews; of the Jews expelled by the Roman proconsul Titus Augustus in 70AD, ushering in the Diaspora; she wanders through Spain (the word Sephardim comes from the Hebrew word for Hispania – Spain: Sepharad), and other parts of the Mediterranean and Europe. What was remarkable then is that today the term applies “anti-Semitism” to describe all opposition to the Jews, when most of them – and certainly its top leadership – do not even have blood “Semite”, because mostly descended from “arios” kázaros euroasiáticos.( )
As an indication of the topical theme of the real origins of the Jews, which has fundamental impact on the rationale that Zionism is to claim the territory where now stands the State of Israel, we reproduce our translation of sections of a remarkable article appeared recently in the Israeli daily Ha'aretz( ) that rescues the historian Shlomo Zand research published in a book ( ) in asserting that the Jewish people is “an invention”, as “never was a Jewish town, but only a Jewish religion, and exile never happened, so that it could not have a return. Zand rejects most of the stories used in the formation of national identity in the Bible…indicating that this is fiction and myth that served as an excuse for the establishment of the State of Israel. & #8221;
Then it adds Zand “The first Jews from Ashkenaz (Germany) did not originate in the Land of Israel and did not reach Eastern Europe from Germany, but converted to Judaism in the Kingdom of the Khazars in the Caucasus. Zand explains what are the origins of Yiddish culture: is not something imported from Germany but is the result of the connection of the descendants of the Kuzari and Germans who traveled to the East, some of them as merchants. Correspondingly, conclude that members of a diverse set of peoples and races, blond and black, brown and yellow converted to Judaism in large numbers. Según Sand, Zionist need to devise for them a shared ethnicity and historical continuity produced a long series of inventions and fictions, together with the invocation of racist theses. Some were invented by the minds of those who conceived the Zionist movement, while others were offered as a result of genetic research conducted in Israel. & #8221;
Are we then to a massive falsification of history by the Zionist world movement that has been used as weapons to establish and maintain high violence to the State of Israel? This growing challenge to the right of the Zionists on the Palestinian territory also seems to explain the increasing vehemence and intellectual violence with which they attack all critics, by applying the sanbenito of “antisemitic”.

Fighting the “anti-Semitism”
Serve these initial data and comments to better understand certain facts related to the kind of crusade in the global fight against “anti-Semitism” recently launched by the United States. Indeed, The 16 October 2004, President George W. Bush signed a law called the Anti-Semitism Review Act Global (Global Anti-Semitism Review Act of 2004), and along which created a special area within the Department of State (U.S. Foreign Ministry), which is to monitor the “anti-Semitism” Worldwide. ( )
As a crucial step in the implementation of the Law, The 22 May 2006 Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice named Gregg Rickman as “Special Envoy in Dept.. State to monitor and combat anti-Semitism” Worldwide. The task of Mr.. Rickman in the new role of world policeman thought, was facilitated by the fact that not even need to define what the “anti-Semitism”, whenever the State Department itself admits to not knowing precisely; this will not worry too much.
The 8 February 2007, the Dept.. of State issued a “Working Definition of Anti-semitism” (or, one “working definition of antisemitism”), clear that “in his report of 2004 on anti-Semitism, European Monitoring Center for Racism and Xenophobia (EUMC – European Monitoring Center on Racism and Xenophobia) noted the lack of a common definition of antisemitism and consistently tried to build a. As a result, a small group of NGOs drafted a tentative definition…..(than) we believe provides an initial guide to anti-Semitism that may eventually be defined and fought and, thus, present this “provisional definition” as a starting point in the fight against anti-Semitism”.
So U.S., strongly endorsed by the World Zionist organizations, intends to carry out a “global struggle against anti-Semitism”, without even knowing how to define with some precision. even, in a footnote in the official statement, the Dept.. State clarifies that “the fact that we reproduce the “provisional definition” EUMC on anti-Semitism should not be interpreted as we accept that definition” (sic!). Let's see what that says “provisional definition” that does nothing but add to the confusion programmed with Zionism addresses this issue:
“Antisemitism is a certain perception of Jews, can be expressed as hatred toward Jews. All rhetoric and physical manifestations of antisemitism directed against Jewish individuals and non-Jews and / or property, toward Jewish community institutions and religious facilities”:( ).
Bright. Immediately thereafter, American Foreign Ministry describes a set of beliefs and opinions, as she, conform “anti-Semitism” and, thus, must be anathematized and fought at the global level, but in the context of our analysis do nothing but add to the confusion and irrationality deepen existing around the concept of “anti-Semitism”. We read on the official website of the State Department www.state.gov, following:
“Contemporary examples of antisemitism in public life, media, schools, work and in the religious sphere could – taking into account the wider context – include but not limited to, The following examples:
• Provide feedback mendacious, inhuman, demonized or stereotyped Jews, claiming that Jews individually or through their collective power up a Jewish world conspiracy, or that Jews control the media, economy, government or other social institutions; ( )
• Accusing the Jews as a people of being responsible for real or imagined crimes committed by any individual or Jewish group, or even for acts committed by non-Jews;
• Deny the fact, reaches, the mechanism (or, the gas chambers), or intentionality of genocide against the Jewish people at the hands of National Socialist Germany and its surrogates and accomplices during World War II (or, the Holocaust);
• Accusing the Jews as a people, him to Israel as a state, inventing or exaggerating the Holocaust;
• Accusing Jewish citizens of being more loyal to the State of Israel, or more loyal to the alleged priorities of Jews worldwide, above the interests of their own nations;
Some examples of the ways in which antisemitism manifests itself for the State of Israel taking into account the overall context could include:
• Denying the Jewish people the right to self determination (eg., stating that the existence of Israel forms a racist project);
• Comparing current Israeli policies with those of the Nazis;
• Consider the Jews collectively responsible for the actions of the State of Israel” ( )
What is remarkable about official U.S. policies, lies in the fact that much of this law is designed to protect and give a sort of “blank check”, and not to an ethnic, but to a particular foreign power: The State of Israel.
This is not surprising when one deepens the analysis of power structures that govern today in the United States and its main allies. The author has written this extensive historical and political analysis on the influence that holds a large network of private power that for almost a century seems to have cornered the levers of real power in the U.S.. This network of power is multi-ethnic comprehensive features and is described in detail in the work “The brain of the world: the hidden face of globalization”.( )
More specifically and as a result of the foreign policy of the Bush administration – especially “war on global terrorism”, las invasiones Afghanistan e Iraq, and the systematic and unlimited support to the State of Israel -, has emerged in top-level academics in the United States a growing debate over what some describe as the “takeover” the “kidnapping” shaft key U.S. foreign policy by a set of powerful private organizations that prioritize the goals and interests of a particular ideology – the Zionist – and a foreign power – The State of Israel.
These U.S. policies which seek to monitor and combat “anti-Semitism”, However, avoid systematically consider what might be the causes of what the Anti-Semitism Review Act states as Global “acts of anti-Semitism in countries throughout the world, including some of the strongest democracies (have) significantly increased in frequency and scope in recent years”.
According to this criterion, The “anti-Semitism” arise spontaneously as a psychological condition that affects virtually all people, over centuries and millennia, and in the most varied geography of the world.
In a major report published by the faculty John F Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University, dean Professor Stephen Walt and John Mearsheimer to take over the teaching of political science at the University of Chicago, rigorously and objectively analyze the influence of the so-called “Israel lobby” not only on the foreign policy of the Bush administration but, historically, from several decades ago.
Walt and Mearsheimer come to a set of conclusions that appear to show that organizations pro-Zionist and pro-Israel AIPAC – American Israeli Public Affairs Committee – have been “twist fundamental axes of U.S. foreign policy to prioritize the national interest of Israel above the national interest of the United States itself in North America”. This paper from Harvard published in March 2006, was then extended to a large book( ) generating a very healthy debate in academic and policy circles high in the northern superpower, now immersed in an unprecedented crisis in its foreign policy because of the serious political errors, military and economic committed by its top leaders.
To facilitate the reading of this report, included in the “ANNEX I” A description of some of the main thrusts forward in the report Walt / Mearsheimer who, predictably, are now loudly accused of “Semitic” by the mainstream media almost exclusively pro-Israel U.S..
However, noteworthy that very high prestige figures as former President Jimmy Carter and the geopolitical and former National Security Adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski not only came to the defense of Walt and Mearsheimer, but they have openly declared that today is important for America to open a broad public debate on what many analysts regard a undue interference from the pro-Israel lobbies in the government of that country. Predictably, Carter and Brzezinski also journalistic sensationalism of them placed the sanbenito “Semitic”.
Other intellectuals as Samuel Huntington, though not explicitly endorse the thesis of Walt and Mearsheimer, however argue that it is dangerous to silence opinions about political issues using techniques such as those described in this report.

What then is the “anti-Semitism”?
These remarkable definitions “anti-Semitism”, applicable only to Jews, does now require the U.S. government of trying to identify where does this universal animosity towards a community so small numerically. and, as seen, so universal and ubiquitous is this animosity “antisemitic” that the American superpower has found it necessary to legislate worldwide to monitor and fight.
Clarify, first, that while the persecution of the Jews had a religious basis in past centuries, today and can not be said that the “anti-Semitism” concerns the scope of the religious, at least not in the West and, Of course, Nor in our continent, happily where religious discrimination has diminished almost completely.
In truth, the real and aggressive religious discrimination exists in the West today is not directed against Judaism, but mainly against the Islamic religion. Particularly, from events 11 September 2001, when the U.S. and its allies launched their “war against Islamic fundamentalist terrorism”, whose arms we see a broad process of psychological warfare that seeks to stereotyping and demonizing Islam as a religion, and all peoples of Middle Eastern Arab Muslims.
Another important factor is the fact that today the Jewish religion does not create animosity between the modern communities, for the simple reason that religion is a non-evangelical and non-militant. Much more intrusive – and thus “bother” and annoying to many people – his, for example, some denominations and sects of Pentecostal and evangelical Christian activists, they may gain adherents, often vulgar style through television, radio, and even house by house.
So say the “anti-Semitism” is a delusion of persecution against the Jewish religion, not stand serious scrutiny, love that in every country in the world today, unfortunately there is a multitude of criminal acts and criminal – everyone convicted of certain – including the desecration of cemeteries, personal attacks and vandalism perpetrated by all sorts of misfits and criminals against large sections of people of all religions, races, ethnicities and social classes. This sad phenomenon affects not only the Jewish communities, but the increasing violence in our cities is a global phenomenon that affects all citizens, and is fed by a complex set of factors ranging from adverse social conditions to the incitement to violence, immorality and perversions of all kinds instigated by the mass media, often with the excuse of “entertain” the people ( ).
What today is called “anti-Semitism” Herzl had already described as “Jewish question”, much in vogue in nineteenth century Europe when Herzl launched the Zionist movement universal. and “The Jewish State”, Herzl said that “the Jewish question exists wherever Jews live in perceptible numbers. In places where there is no Jewish question, is carried by Jews during their migrations. This is true in every country and will remain, even in those highly civilized nations – for example, France – until the Jewish question will find him a position of political bases. The unfortunate Jews are now carrying the seeds of anti-Semitism in England; and they have already introduced in America” ( )
Meanwhile, French Jewish sociologist Bernard Lazare also writing in the late nineteenth century saying,”in all places where Jews… have been established, they all developed anti-Semitism, or rather the anti-Judaism, as anti-Semitism is a poorly chosen word, which had only reason for being in our time, when it has decided to extend the struggle of the Jewish and Christian people and give it a philosophy at the same time that one reason more metaphysical than material. If hostility and disgust only to have been expressed about Jews in a time and in one country could easily unravel the limited causes of this anger; but instead, the Jewish race has been the subject of hatred of all peoples in the midst of which has been established. Since the enemies of Jews belonged to diverse races, living in countries far apart from each other, were governed by different laws and governed by opposite principles, had neither the same way of life nor the same customs and were animated by spirits dissimilar judge barred them just as all things, necessary, hence, that the general causes of antisemitism have always existed in Israel itself, not who they have fought. & #8221;( )
Indeed, entered a rapid historical review a similar pattern of segregation, persecution and expulsion of Jewish communities in over time and global geographies: in antiquity, in Babylon, Egipto, Judah and Israel (at the hands of the Romans); in the Middle Ages, were no expulsions in the British Isles in the thirteenth century, in Spain and Portugal in the fifteenth century; more recently were persecuted in France, Romania, Russia, Hungary, Serbia, Ukraine, Polonia, Germany, and Austria throughout the nineteenth and twentieth, and now are opposed by Islamic countries in the Middle and Far East.
Simultaneously, and with much less intensity, there have been painful episodes of rejection and conflict in countries like the United States of America, Canada, Brazil, Argentina, Chile, Colombia, Mexico, and Peru; something remarkable in Latin America that has welcomed all races in the world with a high degree of freedom and tolerance.
This phenomenon almost universal rejection of the Jews, is explicitly recognized by the legislation against “anti-Semitism” sanctioned by the U.S., forcing a question – obvious and uncomfortable – that is systematically ignored by those who propagate the fallacy confusions “anti-Semitism”: Is it reasonable to assume that, through centuries and millennia, all people who have had contact with the Jewish people suffer from some sort of psychological pathology – called “anti-Semitism” – which leads them to reject and even violently and irrationally to expel Jews from their breast?
Such an assertion seems sided and incomplete, it does not assess the alternative – significantly more likely, by the way – that there may be patterns of social behavior among certain sections of the Jewish communities that generate such rejection.
Insist: the question is ugly but it makes the essence of the problem and that his argument would begin to fathom what would be the true causes of the so-called “anti-Semitism” which has worried the U.S. government and world Zionist organizations.
This question, that is something of enigma “if he came first the chicken or the egg”, seems to have only two possible answers:
1. All peoples of the world who have lived with the Jews through history, and still, are guilty and mentally ill at the time that the Jews are their innocent victims, the
2. There are certain patterns of behavior typical of a certain culture, idiosyncrasy and Jewish traditions, sooner or later, generated resistance and rejection among the societies in which those Jewish communities seeking to insert.
Conclusion:
If the former is correct, then the “anti-Semitism” is a disease that affects all humanity, except the Jews;
If the latter is correct, then the “anti-Semitism” is a reaction to the social behavior of certain Jewish sectors, especially their leaders.
This is the question…
The State of Israel
According to many Zionist organizations, and its spokesmen and supporters in the multimedia and other professional, The “anti-Semitism” said today he would have mutated through critical internal and external policies of the State of Israel. Clearly, this concept has very dangerous because if the charge “antisemitic” serves as a silent weapon, disqualifying and censorship of the opinions and ideas from a broad sector of the community, then we would have a highly detrimental situation because it would be making it increasingly difficult, and professionally risky, analysis, diagnosis and objective criticism of the geopolitics of the State of Israel.
Thus, Israel acquires a privileged status to other States, what is conceptually and politically serious, since it is a nation in constant war with its neighbors, has also been indirectly influence but risky, on the foreign policy of Argentina. Indeed, episode about the bombing of the AMIA headquarters in July-CS 1994, In late 2006 surprisingly, the Argentine government accused a former Iranian president and seven of his ministers have been responsible for this terrorist attack, based on “Intelligence” provided by the secret service of the U.S. and Israel. The origins of this claim Kirchner government are very dubious and unclear, so that in November 2006 the author of this extended an “Open Letter” then-President Nestor Kirchner requesting clarification of what the reasons and commitments undertaken by his government with the international Zionist organizations. Annex III contains the text of the Charter, that was never answered…
According to this perverse logic, today can be criticized – even vehemently – policies of nations like the U.S., Great Britain and Argentina, without involving a sentence of their people – much less to their religious beliefs. But you can not criticize Israel politically, because it means committing “anti-Semitism” as it is described vaguely as discrimination or persecution of Jews as an ethnicity and religion.
In truth, argue that people are rarely “enemies” each. Usually, are their leaders that operate in the adversarial towards certain groups, peoples, nations, ideologies and individuals. The more powerful are those leaderships, greater amounts of political violence, psychological and physical can wield against his opponents.
The core of this thought, then, intends to equate Zionism and the State of Israel, with all the world Jewish community: perverse fallacy because Zionism and the State of Israel are ideological and political constructs respectively, while Jews make up a global presence ethnicity, with varying degrees of intensity, Jewish religious practices.
Not all members are identified with the interests and ideological guidelines of Zionism and Israel. It would be absurd to assume that Jewish ethnicity is aligned 100% behind a political ideology and a particular State, as it would be absurd to assume that those not belonging to that ethnic group are all opposed to the Zionist ideology and the Israeli state.
accordingly, we conclude that not all Jews are Zionists and not all are Jewish Zionist. For more details on this issue closely linked to the Zionist ideology, incorporated as “Annex II” of this report the text of Chapter VI of the author's work “WELCOME TO THE JUNGLE: dominance and survival in the New World Order”( ).
The Republic of Argentina – ethnic melting pot – has a small Jewish community of around 200.000 Jewish people according to official sources( ), that coexists peacefully with other communities – as the majority are Spanish and Italian, or minority as the Germans, Syrian-Lebanese, armenios, Chinese, English, Chilean, Peruvian, Paraguayan, Bolivians, Hungarian, Korean, Scandinavian, Welsh, Arab, and many other.
All together constitute a single people – Argentina -, This does not prevent that every Argentine has the ability and the right to criticize – Indeed, quite justifiably! – our rulers circumstantial, without risking to be accused of “anti-argentinismo” the, Worse, the “Anti-Catholicism” for being a Catholic nation of Argentina, at least in its origins( ).
This is particularly serious since Israel is in perpetual state of war since its founding Forced 1948. Its creation was made at the expense of the Palestinians whose killing, removal to other Muslim countries – notably Lebanon, Syria, Jordan and Egypt – and subsequent occupation by the armed forces of Israel, apart from forming a cruel injustice and flagrant violation of international law, spot vergüenza a toda la humanidad.
The reality is that the State of Israel was created by the force of arms by terrorist operations, against both government officials in charge of the then British Mandate of Palestine, as against the Palestinian people themselves. Those armed operations were organized and carried out by terrorist organizations like the Irgun Zvai Leumi, the Stern Group and The Hagannah (then integrated to form the core of the Israeli Defense Forces – or, national army), guerrilleros and leaders like Menachem Beguin and Isaac Shamir (then elevated to the rank of Israeli prime ministers).

The “Holocaust”
It is also necessary to clarify that if the “anti-Semitism” is one of the tools in this kind of “intellectual terrorism” wielded by Zionism, then the other is what the Jewish writer and researcher, Norman Finkelstein called “The Holocaust Industry”( ) due, as he, the shameful way as the Zionist leaders and the State of Israel is used as a tool to attract support among world public opinion. This is called unlawful use Finkelstein “exploitation of Jewish suffering”, I quote the subtitle of his work.
This support then huge concrete economic assistance, Policy, financial, diplomatic and military, especially the U.S. government and pro-Israel organizations – both Jewish and non-Jewish – worldwide.
Nobody doubts that the so-called “Holocaust” represents one of the great and terrible persecutions and massacres of the twentieth century, but it was neither the only nor the most. It is recalled mass murder as the Armenian genocide at the hands of the Turks between the years 1915 and 1917; destruction 3.000.000 kulak peasants in the Soviet political commissars of Stalin; the 5.000.000 Cambodians slaughtered by the state terrorism of Pol Pot and the Khmer Rouge in Cambodia between 1975 and 1979; the 2.000.000 Vietnamese killed during the invasion of US-China, and the U.S. bombings between 1961 and 1975; one million civilian deaths in 1945 by the U.S. bombings on the open towns of Dresden, Hiroshima and Nagasaki (These last two atomic bombs); and 40.000.000 deaths that are estimated to cost the Chinese communist revolution led by Mao Tse-Tung between 1945 and 1949.
In between all this monstrous savagery in the twentieth century is estimated to cost the lives of more than 100 million people of all nationalities, is clear however that the so-called “Holocaust” Jew has a huge media coverage – Notes, documentary, movies, dramatizations – and today, even, it imposes a compulsory subject in the curricula for primary and secondary U.S., Canada, France and Germany, among other nations. Thus, The “Holocaust” appears to be the only Jewish genocide which has a sort of trademark that separates it from other mass killings, facilitating its spread urbi et orbi, dárselo to a sacred, unique theological.
The growing calls for an investigation of the real extent of “Holocaust” Jewish history more thoroughly due to that it has been used as ideological support of the geopolitics of the State of Israel. Indeed, images of the suffering of European Jews between 1933 and 1945 at the hands of the German National, which have been systematically burned into the collective imagination of the world, constitute the most powerful argument with which it has sought to justify the way they created the state of Israel in 1948, and how that state and their leaders behave until today.
Clearly, if a serious investigation and balanced – still yet to be realized – reached the conclusion that the “Holocaust” was neither the characteristics nor the dimension of myth or “Holocaust Industry” – Finkelstein's words – attributed, then large sections of world opinion concluded that the State of Israel should not be based on how it was: through military conquest, terrorism, the theft of others' lands and the violent expulsion from their land of millions of Palestinians to this day.
Just beginning to be understood that the powerful force for political Zionism revived permanently keep the memory of those terrible images of persecution of European Jews, and “anti-Semitism” allegedly the cause. Until today, However, nobody manages to explain something quite simple and unusual: if Hitler's Germany was responsible for the Holocaust, Why have to pay those Palestinians blame German, giving their blood and their territory to the Zionists? Clearly, Palestinians never had anything to do with Hitler and German National.
If you really wanted to do international justice, so why not re-found an independent Zionist state in any portion of German territory ceded to that effect, while Palestine is returned to the Palestinians? Undeniably, this would lead to a rapid pacification of the Middle East, amen to represent a fair and judicious historical reparation, and be a concrete step towards world peace.
Conclusion: if it became clear that the reality of “Holocaust” and “anti-Semitism” not consistent with what the Zionist and Israeli leaderships would have us believe, then the state of Israel never should have been founded in the manner as was the international community should not tolerate their current behavior.

Conclusions
We have sought to describe the conceptual framework for understanding the reasons that the “anti-Semitism” it is used as a tool or weapon within the broad strategies and planetary scope designed to promote and consolidate the objectives, interests and power of certain political organizations and foreign states.
Viewed from this perspective, understood why the accusation of “anti-Semitism” is used to silence, censor and discredit those who seek to criticize or oppose such a set of goals and interests identified.
Individuals and organizations that promote such interests and objectives are often closely linked to the global Zionist organizations – several of which operate in Argentina -, and foreign powers, notably the State of Israel and the U.S..

Continued on About “anti-Semitism” ANNEXES

Bibliography
• Carter, Jimmy – Palestine: Peace or Apartheid? Simon & Schuster, New York, 2006
• Dunlop, Douglas Morton – Professor of History of the Middle East, Columbia University, “The History of the Jewish Khazars” (1954, Princeton Uiversity Pres.)
• Finkelstein, Norman – lecturer in political science at City University of New York, Hunter College, “The Holocaust Industry: Reflections on the Exploitation of Jewish Suffering” (New York, 2000) – There Castilian version: “The Holocaust Industry: Reflections on the Exploitation of Jewish Suffering” (Twenty First Century Publishers of Argentina, Buenos Aires, 2002).
• Herzl, Theodor, “The Jewish State” – Doubleday, New York, 1988
• Koestler, Arthur – The Thirteenth Tribe: The Khazar Empire and its Heritage” – Picador Books, London 1977
• Lazarus, Bernard – “Anti-Semitism. Its History and Its Causes”, Ediciones de la Bastille, Buenos Aires, 1974
• Mearsheimer, John y Walt, Stephen – “The Israel Lobby and US Foreign Policy” – Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York, 2007
• Poly, Abraham N – Professor of Middle Eastern History, Tel-Aviv University – “The Khazar Conversion to Judaism” (1941, Hebrew newspaper “Zion”).
• Salbuchi, Adrian – “WELCOME TO THE JUNGLE: dominance and survival in the New World Order” – Editorial Anabasis – Cordoba, 2005
• Salbuchi, Adrian – “The brain of the world: the hidden face of globalization” – Ediciones del Copyist, 4ta edition, Cordoba, 2003.