David Irving THE CONDEMNATION AND THE QUESTION OF THE HOLOCAUST

David Irving THE CONDEMNATION AND THE QUESTION OF THE HOLOCAUST
Write Alberto Tosti – March 2006

Violating the most elementary rights to freedom of expression and intimidate the investigation of some key events in contemporary history, a Court of Vienna, Austria, has imprisoned British historian David Irving in relation to his studies on the so-called Holocaust of the Jewish people during World War II. This fact – It is unprecedented that directly and indirectly in the World – opens a new chapter in the level of repression of ideas that is taking place today under Democratic Intolerance.

A 60 years after the end of the conflict, World War II has been removed from Historiography and consolidates growing tendency to show the historical events through the prism of an ideological and mythical past reality. We are facing a serious methodological procedure: dogmas or prejudices are taxes as determinants of historical research. If we compare this behavior with the traditional negative images broadcast on the Inquisition in general and in particular the Galileo case, find that there are no major substantive differences about, except change the actors.

THE PROBLEM OF THE HOLOCAUST.
Persecutions suffered by the Jewish people during World War II under the National Socialist government of Germany has come to be of increasingly inconsistent exaggeration in light of historical facts. Although each of these points deserves a detailed explanation that we can not deepen here (though these have already been made, precisely, by a long series of researchers, including David Irving, which has some thirty papers about), the central questions that exist about the Holocaust may be summarized in three:
1. That is not proven who died in World War II six million Jews and a figure close to that total minimal.
2. That is not proven that the Germans have made massive and systematic killings, industrial type, in the concentration camps; nor had the technical ability to do.
3. Nor is evidence that Nazi Germany had an extermination plan against the Jews.
These points have been widely debated in terms of administrative statistics population, European and domestic migration totals interned in German camps, as well as successive versions inaccurate about the victims in these fields. As a paradigmatic example, cites the case of Auschwitz-Birkenau, which speaks of millions of victims while the official information released by the Soviet Government under the administration Gorbachev would refer to only 74.000 killed during the entire existence of the field (1941-1945) and all kinds of concepts (diseases, accidents, executions, etc).
This kind of exaggeration – product especially for postwar propaganda – has as one of its remarkable history, for example, the case of changing versions of installations and the death toll at Dachau, Bavaria. The theories or versions without historical support, questionable examples and contradictions about the concentration camps and the treatment of the Jews within them are manifested in such a systematic way that allowed them to doubt the totality of the information provided for this purpose (information, moreover, are controlled by the Allied victors of World War II and / or Jewish institutions), with the aggravating circumstance such information is ultimately began to take shape years after the conflict ended, mainly in the 1960, with the Eichmann case. Such new versions are as or more striking from the time they were not sustained due to the Nuremberg Trial, where the Allies – Prosecutors and judges of the defeated Germany – handled with absolute discretion in the charges, testimony and documentary evidence against the Nazi leaders who were sentenced to death. The reality of mass extermination of Jews in German concentration camps has also been rightly placed in doubt due to the technical impossibility of having carried out such kind of mass killings. Not only were the facilities for the alleged mass gassing of prisoners but could not have carried out the physical disappearance of an unusually high incidence of people without a trace.
The Leuchter Report, which proves the absence of pressurization in the bathrooms to have served as Auschwitz gas chambers and that demonstrates the infeasibility of the use of Zyklon B for the death of human beings – was a pesticide used to disinfect clothes and bodies – was just one of the heaviest blows against technical versions of the Holocaust. Finally, strained interpretation of the Protocol of January Wahnsee 1942 – a meeting of officials of a second or third level to coordinate the transfer of Jews to the east – documentary evidence is not reliable or be associated with directives of the German Government for the purposes of planning the extermination of the deportees.
But, repeat, This topic is overwhelming in this work and not the object of the same, but corresponds only to the Holocaust problem statement as it stands in light of the lack of historical evidence on the same. And this is the key area where research and extension should be trying to hide through the suppression of ideas and claims of a review of the theory of the Holocaust.

POLITICAL AND FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT OF THE ISSUE.
International pressures arising from the very strong Jewish influence in the Modern World – especially in the political, financial and communications – are designed to impose widespread and unquestioned belief of the Holocaust as a historical fact. This is the central theme that has come to be institutionalized with the passing years, so that phasing out the logic of almost all the references and witnessed the events of World War II, mythical conception of the Holocaust and untestable grew to levels unusual in our day. Las motivaciones prácticas de tales campañas se han venido desnudando cada vez más a raíz de los negociados fabulosos sobre indemnizaciones exigidas por distintos sectores de la comunidad judía a países y/o instituciones que pudiesen haber estado comprometidos – directly or indirectly – in the so-called Holocaust.
Such is the typical case of Germany, which has been so far the major contributor and financial supporter of Israel; and the Swiss banking, pressed to acknowledge the payment of compensation to third parties for frozen accounts of Jewish people since the time of the War. This chapter – derived from the theory of the Holocaust – has become so bold ribbons that seem to be encouraging more prudent that Jewish personalities – as the case of Norman Finkelstein, son of Jewish survivors of concentration camps and author of the critical work “The Holocaust Industry” – take precautionary distance of traditional versions until now accepted. The armed institutional type this whole business of extortion carried out by different sectors of Judaism in terms of current theory of the Holocaust, However, is threatened by the advance of historical research about; and therefore becomes necessary for these sectors to categorize the Holocaust dogma, as a way to sustain their narrow interests of financial subsidies, benefit the Jewish image of a persecuted people throughout history, shore up public opinion favorable to the State of Israel and, moreover, tend towards a new worldview and World Jewish Life.
The materialistic or financial aspect of the issue of the Holocaust is obviously not the focus of the issue but a byproduct or derivative of background theme, but serves to characterize the multiple use of the Jewish arguments at various levels of global life, while always maintaining the arises mainly of a political-ideological. It has been suggested, for example, the possibility of using the case as a way to internationalize Irving called “denial” as a global crime and put to use against Iran's president, Mohamed Ahmadinejad, following his recent statements against the veracity of the Holocaust. The Jewish People – thus obviously not generalize the behavior of all members – since Biblical times has a tradition cruel and vindictive, without prejudice to their deep spirituality and social adaptability.
Taking into account the important history of the Jewish community throughout history and particularly its crucial role in modern times due to their high participation in power structures developed until today, The Jews – as defined and organized people – are not exactly strangers to the main events occurring worldwide. Intellectuals, State politicians and Jews were craftsmen in the creation, expansion and consolidation of Marxism-Leninism, of Trotskyism y de la Socialdemocracia, one hand, as well as its counterpart in the West Liberal Capitalism, other. There is hardly relevant area of national life and planet where there is a major presence – and often decisive – Jewish groups of power, particularly in the economic-financial.
This supports the objective observation that Jews are a community that has a power disproportionate to their numbers and, although it can not be shown to constitute a unified institutional structure of power in the world, factual trend internationally is gradually converging in terms of Jewish interests in the world. Viewed as a whole, within the framework of institutional policies of their community organizations and the hard policy of the State of Israel against the Arabs, Jewish actions revealed today, themselves, power accompanied by a rampant impunity that recognizes no limits comparable to any country in the world, except the United States, with whose leadership exists just a very high integration and coincidence.

Holocaust theology.
Although the explanation is far more complex and here we are going to say no mixing of certain mystical references and speculations about its scope at present, since the mid-nineteenth century a branch of European Jewry was strengthen the hypothesis that the Messiah was not necessarily an individual but by the Israelites expected that the Jewish people as a whole was his own Messiah. This is a line of thought closely tied to the flow of proto-Zionism and whose main speakers were Rabbi Moses Hess, Adolphe Cremieux, Rabbi Baruch Levi – Rothschild's friend and conductor Karl Marx – and other important personalities of the Jewish community. This idea of “Collective Messiah” – the identification of a privileged people chosen by God to rule the destiny of the World – is a striking compatibility with the development of the myth of the Holocaust, understood as presented in the light of its pseudo-historical development. The mythical concept of the Holocaust would be designed to meet two objectives: one hand, constitute an internal clumping factor Jewish community itself, always uniting under a “common vital interest” against real or perceived threats exogenous; and another, institutional set a preponderance of Jews to the nations, because it could also be the foundation of a new universal syncretistic religion imposed on traditional Christianity, where the figure of the martyrdom of Jesus Christ would be progressively displaced by the image of the martyrdom of millions of Jews; and where all peoples – beginning with the Christian nations – tend to assume gradually a “new original sin” product of historical discrimination against Jews.
From this point of view, indisputable dogmatic acceptance of the Holocaust would then provide an essential step in the consolidation of a Judeo-centric view of history and humanity all, intolerant absolutist conception where everything is split or differentiate between favorable and unfavorable institutional Judaism, a dualistic vision, fundamentalist between “axes” of Good and Evil where everything must be defined by positive and negative depending on the idea of Israel. The submission to the Power of Money largely explains the emergence of new myths of our time, to the extent that they are held and distributed by Media Education and Social Communication dependent on power structures that are a source Money. And mind you, when we refer to the concept of Myth, we do it in its proper significance as the myth is defined as an allegorical tradition is based on a real event, the philosophical history, whether that is true or false. Within this scheme, Holocaust theory seems to be – under all evidence – one of the cornerstones of the redesign of a new worldview (Belief), a new world view and life designed to rethink the ideas of Men. This mechanism of psychological domination – the prophecy of “big brother” Orwell television embodied not in a communist society, but under a capitalist system – has come today, Probably, to the point of greatest aspiration, it is control of ideas, with the consequent imposition of easements mental product of naive belief or intellectual complicity salary.
It is the embodiment of the concept of the late Professor Carlos Disandro, in the sense that the final battle for world domination is waged, ultimately, at the level of control of the human mind. So, so insistently seeks not only the establishment of historical beliefs untested – as the case of the Holocaust – but also blocking freedom of expression and inhibition of any investigation that may be revisionist “dangerous” for the system of dominant ideas. and, in parallel, this is especially to achieve by this means the imposition of Repentance, this is, public humiliation or subjection to certain concepts that are presented, a priori, how “dogmatic truths” that are beyond dispute.
Thus we see today, markedly, which governs the “Capitalist West” The same method of background that were once denounced in the “Communist East”: the accused are forced to recognize their “crime” beforehand, to apply for leniency after penalties. And as the only doubt in the existence of the Holocaust – Rules say as incredibly Austrian and German – is considered “crime”, the only alternative that remains to those reported with these arguments is dogmatic and ideological apologize and ask for the benevolence of its judges. And if they show signs of “repentance” – as the case Priebke, Despite the relativity of the charges raised against him and his age – may remain in prison until the end of their lives. The recent conviction of Irving in Austria like a repeat of the episode of Galileo – commonly transmitted by the image of their dispute (than, turn, was different from the historical reality) – but in its contemporary version: because what is sought is ultimately not only the punishment and intimidation against the “bad examples” but the staff kowtowing, his renunciation of revisionist research to the extent that such line of study is compromising the interests of ideological and dogmatic institutional Judaism. And this is, Ultimately, forcing the resignation to the free study and knowledge of the Truth.
The Gospels teach us that only the truth makes us free; and it, two consequences arising practice: one hand, Ethics duty in seeking the truths of Faith; and another, release of the Lie because, in practice, which generates a lie after lie lives condemned to continue to hold. It is like a natural mechanism of punishment for their disloyalty to the forger's testimony before the Truth. And so is the great historical falsehoods, that once made fall into the inevitable need to, to sostenerlas, must continue bickering its inconsistencies for all the “building” built on its fallacies does not collapse as a “house of cards”. And then you have to appeal – such as Irving – the power to establish the “suppression of ideas”, the imposition of “Dogma” face reality, the setting of new “Indisputable truths” against Reason and Revisionism Official History. It is said that there is no worse tyranny than that which is exercised on behalf of Liberty; and we add that there Totalitarianism worse than that exerted in the name of Democracy: Intolerance is hidden inside the alleged Liberties, which denies the true Freedom of Speech and Research to Men.
Buenos Aires, February 2006
_____________________________________________
Alberto Tosti – Researcher and writer based in Buenos Aires.
© The Translator Chart – allowed partial or total reproduction quoting the source.