Alberto Nisman: operates as State Attorney of Israel in Argentina
Dr. Juan Gabriel Labak is counsel of Messrs. Alberto Alberto Jacinto Kanoore Edul and Kanoore Edul, arbitrarily prosecuted by the Justice Argentina in the case of terrorist attack on the AMIA headquarters in July 1994.
After spending seven courts, generate bundles totaling over one million folios, with aberrations involving a Federal Judge (Juan Jose Galeano) paying u $ s 400.000 in bribes (a Telleldin) operators provided and coordinated by the State of Israel in Argentina (remarkably, DAIA today chaired by Ruben Beraja prisoner and his now bankrupt Banco Mayo) to assemble the lie of (nonexistent) van "Traffic" white allowing the Buenos Aires police blame and, by extension, Syria and, Hezbollah and by extension, by extension, Iran, Today we come to shame in the Executive Branch of the Kirchner and "Justice" deplorable and treacherous (Corral Canicota judge and prosecutors Nisman / Martinez Burgos), impose all the arbitrary measures to promote immoral interests and objectives in our country of a foreign power: The State of Israel.
In any decent country, this is what called "Treason". This Argentina Cologne, is called "Justice" and "Memory"..
All around lie concocted the bombing of the AMIA, which has placed Argentina in a weak position and committed to international level - besides that the Kirchner government has assaulted a defiantly free country with which we maintained good relations (the Islamic Republic of Iran) – is based on the existence of an alleged Renault "Traffic" was to be used white as a car bomb. Since the existence of that vehicle is key to validate the official thesis, in early August, Dr.. Labaka Nisman asked the Prosecutor will take steps to verify its pre-existence to the terrible attack of July 1994.
In this "Traffic" white was not found virtually nothing except for some pieces and the engine block (conveniently found by an Israeli officer in the rubble of Pasteur Street 633, than (very conveniently) the number of home manufacture!!!).
Dr. Labak said / Nisman asked, inter alia:
1. That there is ample suspicion that never existed that "Traffic" that the prosecutor Nisman said the terrorists used as a car bomb;
2. That bold statement that the attack was made with the car bomb is the basis of the charge against the defendants, Gentlemen Kanoore Edul;
3. than, Also, Republic of Iran has rejected pleas in which requested the extradition of 8 his diplomats and rulers, among other reasons, considering that there is no evidence of the existence of the "Traffic" or another car bomb in the attack;
4. So, Dr. Labaka Nisman asked to proceed to dig up 4 meters at the site where it is alleged car bomb exploded, as the expert on behalf Commander (R) Osvaldo Laborda, states that the Traffic remains were buried there by the explosion effect; and
5. As did the Supreme Court of Justice of Mexico with great success, in the case of the Embassy of Israel, requesting the National Academy of Engineering designated three of its best specialists in explosives to carrying out the scientific expertise to determine where the explosion actually occurred in the AMIA: if outside with a car bomb, or inside the building.
This application is vital to the AMIA bombing. If you dig into the scene and found no remnants of the "Traffic", NO would then verified the existence of the alleged car bomb, thus also no records would vanish the "Iranian Connection" armed by the SIDE, Attorney Nisman and Kirchner government based on "intelligence" provided in October 2006 by U.S. intelligence services (CIA) and the State of Israel (Mossad), and that both want to "test drive" the state of Israel itself, AMIA, DAIA, CIA, The U.S. State Dept., Zionist organizations local and foreign, Kirchner and the large local multimedia.
Charged, then renewed strength in the far more plausible ISRAELI CONNECTION. or, that the bombing of the AMIA (and the Embassy in 1992), takes on a whole new dimension and credible when it is inserted into the internal struggles within the State of Israel itself in the years 90, culminating less than 16 months after the AMIA bombing to the assassination of Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin in November 1995, at the hands of a terrorist right-wing Jewish Zionist (Amir Ygal).
Thereafter, displacement was more moderate Labor Party in the Israeli government, which has since been firmly in the hands of extremist elements in the ultra-right fundamentalist, racist and violent the Likud (Netanyahu) and Kadima (Sharon – Olmert), among others.
Now, We learned that the prosecutor Nisman rejects the request of Dr. Labaké.
Against all evidence, Prosecutor Alberto Nisman decided by decree that the AMIA bombing occurred outside the building, y con un coche-bomba "Traffic". Thus, Alberto Nisman had to return to the dogmatic obscurantism and Torquemada to safeguard the "official story" ...
Below we reproduce the response of Dr. John Labaka prosecutor Alberto Nisman.
REVER repeated requests for the "official story" – AVAILABLE EXPERTISE AND EXCAVATION TO DETERMINE IF YOU REALLY EXISTED CAR BOMB - ADVICE IS REQUESTED TO CSJN
Mr. Hammer:
Juan Gabriel Labaka, lawyer CSJN T.7 F.311, in his capacity as defender of Mr. Alberto Kanoore edule and Alberto Jacinto Kanoore Edul, established up in File 8566/96 “COPPE, Juan Carlos and other s/ conspiracy and other crimes, the AMIA bombing and CS "bundle 129, Mr. fiscal respectfully say:
I read with amazement the decision of the district attorney why my order refuses to thoroughly investigate whether there was the car bomb Traffic, and whether the explosion was inside or outside the building of the AMIA. My amazement stems from the fact that she offered in my letter so abundant and strong evidence on the lack of traffic and that the explosion occurred inside the AMIA, which can only be rejected or ignored my submission that if there is a grim determination to hide something, or to avoid "surprises" for those who put together this research undeniable rigged.
I so serious allegation because it is not the first time that the district attorney is refusing to investigate leads very important and visible. One was with the case of a proven agent belonging to Argentina's SIDE (at least to the SIDE of Antonio Stiusso, with whom the district attorney has a suggestive empathy) and both the U.S. DEA. The double agent openly lied in a smear blaming a doctor Neuquen offspring of Arab and Muslim, creating a false evidence against my client Edul son. Despite evidence that so gross an agent of the SIDE and the DEA was trying to falsely incriminate my client, creating false evidence, Mr. fiscal twice rejected my request for quote to declare such an agent of "misunderstanding" Argentine-American, subordinate Stiusso. This valuable clue died at the hands ... and at the express decision of the district attorney.
A second and very suggestive of the Attorney refusal to follow tracks was very serious because of the stubborn disobedience and illegal SIDE (of the Stiusso, of course) interventions ever sent two Edul phones during 1994, as he had requested the prosecutor in April 2005. At my insistence, the prosecutor said that these recordings were the last investigation that was pending before the Edul terminate. I asked three times to require the sending of such SIDE recordings, and three times the district attorney refused to do so, and still do not, after four and a half years of disobedience manifested in the SIDE of Stiusso.
There were many other examples of bias almost bordering on autistic and dereliction of duty of public servant (and other more serious criminal offenses) with the district attorney refused, stubbornly and without giving reasons, to investigate tracks "politically incorrect". But now filled the measure with its rejection of my request to investigate whether there really was the traffic and if the explosion was outside or inside the AMIA.
The suspicion is inescapable: Does the district attorney is pursuing and to discriminate against my clients because they descendants of Arabs and Muslims? I do not know the religion professed by the district attorney, but there are two very major data, which are public knowledge and understanding about other suggestive: and 2007 attended the district attorney as "special guest" at the Annual Meeting of the American Jewish Committee " (of active militancy and pro-Zionist Israel) to report on the progress of the investigation of this case; and 2008 traveled to Tel Aviv (Israel) to account for research as much as the president of the Supreme Court of that foreign State.
It is worth remembering that the State of Israel has nothing to see or do in the judicial investigation of the AMIA bombing, it is an entity that mutual Argentina, incorporated and registered under the law Argentina, all killed in the attack were from Argentina and the offense occurred in Argentine territory. Faced with this incontrovertible evidence, Explains how the district attorney his two trips abroad mentioned, and the two reports submitted to politicians and foreign officials? and, moreover, This test is not very strong and, both, clear explanation of the anti-Arab bias and anti-Muslim that the Honorable Prosecutor is acting?
The above shows that the district attorney suffers from very strong likes and dislikes, which lead to Tyre and Trojans measured with different standards. In all forgiven SIDE, to the extent of lawlessness and dereliction of duty and concealment.
The American Jewish Committee and the Court of Israel pays homage. As to my clients, Argentines are descendants of Arab and Muslim, denied even the most elementary research. Do you act or not guided by his personal likes and phobias, ideological, Ethnic, religious and / or policies, the prosecutor in this case Mr?
ultimately, The Office has rejected my request to investigate facts (Insist, facts) arguing that "all the measures required (for me) tends to confirm circumstances duly refuted and discarded in the ruling after oral and public debate before the Court oral Federal Criminal No. 3, ends which were then validated by the National Chamber of Criminal Appeal and the Supreme Court of Justice in The Nation ".
The prosecution can not be bothered, Well, when I say that my order was rejected only because it goes against the "official history", ritually sacred dogma spread "urbi et orbi", which can not even hesitate, and less to investigate its authenticity despite the evidence that is false, without falling into judicial anathema.
Do not offend the intelligence and legal skills of Mr. fiscal reminding that in terms of facts and research, at least in criminal court proceedings and at this stage (but also in the trial as such), nothing is ever judged. And you can always and should be back on research and interpretation of the facts, whenever there is a sufficient ground for, or even the slightest suspicion. The opposite is to fall into the most abject obscurity, Criminal Law and this is an arbitrary uppercase.
Fortunately, el TOF3, the Court of Appeals and the Supreme Court also did not establish by decree that the sun revolves around earth, because in that case the district attorney and would have condemned Galileo Galilei again to die in the fire of religious discrimination and / or ethnic.
Given the above, ask that you review the refusal of the district attorney and make the necessary and sensible investigations mentioned. I request, actually, fill only a formality, because I do not think anything in the world does Mr. fiscal act according to logic, reason and the law, as to be accountable for their conduct to the American Jewish Committee and the Supreme Court of Israel.
The district attorney knows, like everyone else, than those not forgive, and less to their own.
JUSTICE WILL provide under.
Clearly, by Trojan Horses to which we have crossed the blindness and ignorance income, our afflicted Argentina today is not only a financial settlement of international usury, but a political colony of Zionism and the State of Israel itself.
