Theft of Public Funds in Santa Cruz for the MDK (Misdemeanor Marriage Kirchner)

In today's edition, the newspaper "La Nacion" published an article by its correspondent in Rio Gallegos, Mariela Arias, on the current status of missing Santa Cruz public funds into the hands of Nestor and Cristina Kirchner, and his partners in crime.

This theft of public money into the hands of "MDK" (Misdemeanor Marriage Kirchner) was carried out in April 1993 (ago 16 ½ years!!), no one can do anything about it..

Sponsored by Dr.. Juan Gabriel Labaka, Enrique Romero and Adrian Salbuchi lies our Report in May 2004 (CAUSE 6662/04 in the Federal Court not. 7), but nothing we could do to counter the shameful outrages of "Justice K", in which Kirchner ended up being dismissed by federal judge staff (and nephew), Santiago María Lozada.

In our book "The Case of Santa Kruz Funds: Néstor Kirchner's missing " (Editorial Anabasis, Cordoba, 2007) we make a detailed description of our representations to the Federal Courts involved, as well as at the Office "Anti-Corruption" (who looked away and washed his hands), NGO Poder Ciudadano (cowardly and shameful action, also washed their hands), the Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation (aligned to the interests cowardly K; also wash your hands), and the Ombudsman's Office (Nor could intervene but at least they tried unsuccessfully to obtain copies of the decision of "Judge K" Lozada).

Clearly, for those in power in this corrupt and cowardly Argentina, ordinary citizens like Labaka, Romero and Salbuchi are merely "Kelpers" fourth or fifth category, those who are given little or no attention. Surely you, reader, also feel increasingly "Kelpers" in their own country. You're right: You is! Those wishing more details of this scandalous case, may request a copy (Free) Internet book above. You can also watch our video "Desktop Sta Cruz: Kirchner's missing "in these two links on YouTube:

Part 1: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v = dFBShIKPDUQ

Part 2: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xcg13ejCe-g

Please announce to the public as Argentina this vital information about the criminals who have usurped power in Argentina.

The Kirchner have financed his political campaigns, integration in power, and personal interests (Illicit enrichment) with stolen public funds as these funds from Santa Cruz, and money of criminal origin (suitcases with millions of dollars from Venezuela, “contribuciones” de narco-empresas, Skanska bribes, and so many more crimes).

It's in you fight for the MDK - Marriage Misdemeanor Kirchner – leave the site that have usurped.

If we do nothing today, let us not complain tomorrow ...

Slave's who I hope to come another to release ...

__________________________________________

The curious path of the funds of Santa Cruz

THE NATION entered the judge's ruling on how Kirchner ordered Lozada U.S. $ 500 million

NewsPolicy: Previous | next

Sunday 15 November 2009 | Published in print edition

Mariela Arias
Correspondent in Santa Cruz

RIO GALLEGOS.- The judge who dismissed the former president Néstor Kirchner for alleged crimes related to the management and administration of funds abroad blamed the prosecutor and judges before he instructed the cause. With four years of delay, the judge delivered the ruling Santiago Lozada unpublished until now, following a request initiated by La Nacion in court last year.

Since May 2005, Kirchner dismissed when Lozada, neither petitioners nor journalists nor deputies who were able to access requested by the foundation which was fought not guilty Kirchner and Sergio Acevedo. Knowing the ruling does not change the sentence, but it throws unpublished data: who stated, Kirchner who advised during the crisis 2001 and, especially, the lines he used on an issue of justice remains controversial.

For the judge, the intervention of the prosecutor was characterized “by great carelessness and inaccuracy which greatly hampered the work of this instruction”. As the cause lacked “a factual platform that produces a blurring of the boundaries of the procedural object investigated”. Lozada called the initial complaint “imprecise, lacking data on circumstances of time, place and manner, y estructurada sobre meras sospechas, guesswork and inferences”.

The alleged crimes of advocacy of crime and fraud against the public administration, breach of the duties of public office and misappropriation of public funds had been denounced by journalists Adrian Salbuchi and Enrique Romero and Juan Labaka sponsored in May 2004 in federal court No. 7, subrogated by Jorge Urso, investigated it in the first instance with the federal prosecutor Federico Delgado.

At the end of the year, Guillermo Montenegro took over as judge without further processing and turned the case to justice in Santa Cruz. In the ruling, Lozada insisted that that was the cause, which is the sum of six cases filed in various courts porteños- define the order lacked procedural. He argued that as an investigating judge had no authority to “initiate an audit on the work carried out by the institutions of state powers, violating the separation of powers under the pretext of a possible commission of criminal acts, or replace the parliamentary mechanisms capable of solving certain disputes”, and clarifies that to do so would imply a breakdown of constitutional order.

However, Dr. Andres Vivanco, que patrocinó a LA NACION en la presentación judicial, Lozada says “was empowered to extend the procedural object, delimitarlo y calificarlo jurídicamente y, if he disagreed with the prosecutor's job and what had been done until he received the cause, could well have done so and not hide behind an investigation not because he lacked information, but should have actually investigated”.

Lozada decided to investigate after 2001 because there were three complaints in the courts that had been filed on the same subject. The allegations raised in opposition 1996, 1997 and 1999 that the government presented no reports on the funds that were not working and inspection bodies created for that purpose.

The county won a court for the national state royalty bad settled for $ 630 million. and 1999, the sale of YPF shares gave a balance of U.S. $ 602 million.The Kirchner failure to dismiss was based on provincial law 2663, approved by a majority Kirchner late 2003, in which no supporting documentation is bleached in the period 1996-2002 the province joined their budgets U.S. $ 532 million of its original savings and validated that had deposited abroad U.S. $ 529 million.

But Lozada does not account for this in the finding or speaking of the complaints of eight opposition deputies. and 2004, Senator Carlos Prades (UCR) filed an injunction on the funds and asked to declare unconstitutional the law 2663.

Two key witnesses who testified before Urso said Kirchner late 2001 aimed to transfer the funds in the United States to European banks. Eduardo Cafaro, a director of Central Bank from 2003, stated in the case and determine responsibilities that state control over those funds. Cafaro, Financial Advisor Bank of Santa Cruz (1994-2000), said that initially these duties, the province had external funding.

Alfredo Jorge Maclaughlin, former general manager in the country at Deutsche Bank, stated that in late 2001 held a consultation period with Kirchner: “The province had about $ 500 million deposited in U.S. bank”, he believed was the Morgan Stanley.

In early 2002, Maclaughlin had another meeting in which he spoke about the desirability of the deposits were in a safe place. He says “In” participated in “any transfer of funds”, but he knew that “there was a transfer of funds to UBS”.