Qadhafi의 리비아는 글로벌 시스템 진짜 효력이 있는지 알아

... 선출된 국회의 시스템이 선전을 기반으로 투표를이기려면. 그것은 단어의 진정한 의미에서 선동가의 시스템입니다. 투표 구입하실 수 있으며 위조한. 가난한 사람들이 선거 캠페인에서 경쟁 수 없습니다, 그 결과는 단지 부자가 당선이다.

- 그린 북 콜로. Muammar Qadhafi

에 트리폴리에서 가진 기자 회견에서 7 행진, 전 리비아 외무 장관은 무사 Koussa는 분리 반란군을 지원하여 자신의 국가를 분할하려는의 서양 힘이 비난: "그것은 그들이 동부 리비아의 편이 사람들과 연락을하니 분명. 그것은 리비아를 분할하는 음모가 분명. secessionists 연락을 시작 최초의 국가 영어 것처럼 영어는 과거의 식민지 시대에 대한 열망 아르, 뿐만 아니라 프랑스와 미국으로. "

이 문장은 리비아 지도자의 인식 부분은 글로벌 파워 엘리트가 전체적으로 자신의 나라와 지역에 관한 것을 큰 목적입니다 단지 방법을 보여줍니다. 미스터 Koussa 같은 사람이 무엇 프랑스 모든 아웃 공격 핑계 역할을 자신의 나라에서 갑자기 민사 다툼을 운전에만 너무 잘 알고, 리비아에 대한 영국과 미국, "인권을 통해 우려가되지 않습니다,"또는"민주주의,"또는"민간 인구를 보호. "오히려, 무엇 globalist 의제에 정말 것은 제압하기 위해 필요합니다, 약화와 리비아를 제어, 주로 콜 아래에 있기 때문에. Muammar Qadhafi의 리더십은 Libyans는 글로벌 파워 엘리트에 절을 절대.

리비아에서의 무기 기술의 중단을 협상하는 실용적인 의지를 보이고 있습니다 2004, 웨스트하기 위해 대대적인 '달콤한 원유 "석유 자산을 판매하기로 합의, 그리고 록커비 사건에 대한 정치적 해결책을 정의, 아직 Qadhafi 아래에 그들은 서양 강요에 굴복하지 않을, 이집트의 지도자로, 사우디 아라비아, 쿠웨이트, 예멘 아랍 공화국, 바레인, 두바이와 카타르가있다. 이러한이란과 시리아와 같은 지역의 다른 비 - 정렬 국가와 비슷한 전망을 보유.

리비아 (또는 가시 - Libyas 여러) 친절한 케어데이커 정권하에1 그들은 전세계 많은 국가에서 달성으로, 미국과 영국의 석유 회사를위한 천국 - 보내 것입니다, 이 지역에서 미국 영국 이익을위한, 이스라엘에 대한 ...

더블 표준:
UN 해상도 없음. 1973

리비아가 아니란거야. 리비아는 모든 Libyans입니다. 안전 보장 이사회가 유엔에 따라 권한이 없기 때문에 안전 보장 이사회의 결의가 잘못되었습니다. 어떤 국가의 내부 문제에 개입 헌장 ... 당신은 우리의 내부 문제에 개입 어느 권리가 없다. 누가 당신에게 우리의 내부 문제에 개입하는 권리를 준? 당신이 우리 내부 문제에 개입 방향으로 조치를 취할 경우 당신은 그것을 후회하게 될거다, 우리 나라의 사정. 그것은 참으로 우리 나라입니다; 그것은 국가 수 없습니다.

- 프랑스 대통령 리비아 지도자 Muammar Qadhafi 보낸 편지에서, 영국 총리와 UN 사무 총장.

국가 이후 국가에서, Globalist의 의제는 잘 일한 것 같았다, except in Libya where their interventionist plans were not on schedule. Forces loyal to Col. Qadhafi were putting secessionists forces centred on Benghazi up against a wall. 남남서, “emergency action” had to be taken. All of a sudden the mainstream media began noisily echoing French, British and US hysteria regarding the need to immediately “protect” East Libya’s “civilian population” against Qadhafi’s attacks. A “concern” most surprising, when you consider that the UK, France and the US had no qualms when Hosni Mubarak was killing Egyptians earlier this year, or when authoritarian Saudis invaded (or were sent in by the US?) Bahrain a few weeks ago2 whilst Yemeni leader Ali Abdullah Saleh gave his police shoot-to-kill orders against anti-government demonstrators.

Clearly, the “good guy/bad guy” rationale depends on whether the ongoing “guy” is willing to subordinate to the Global Power Elite or not. This brings to mind an anecdote from the nineteen-forties when one of US president Franklin D Roosevelt’s aides pointed out to him his moral concerns over US support of Nicaraguan dictator Anastasio Somoza whom he considered to be an “SOB”; to which Roosevelt candidly replied by saying, “Yes, you’re right; he 입니다 an SOB; but he’s our SOB!"

Over seventy years later, the US has systematically backed – and still backs – a veritable army of SOB caretaker presidents, prime ministers, sheiks and military strongmen. Trouble only starts for ruling SOB’s if and when they cease honouring explicit or implicit political agreements with the US-UK-Israel, as happened to Panama’s Manuel Noriega in 1989, and to Saddam Hussein first in 1991 and then in 2003.

The fact is Qadhafi never cozied up to the US, the UK and Israel, however global oil cartel interests in Libya won him a lease of life. The time has come, 그러나, when the Global Power Elite objectives now go far beyond oil: they need to redraw the geopolitical map of the Middle East and North Africa, which entails eroding all Nation-States in the region in preparation for the coming World Government. And Qadhafi’s Libya is clearly not ready to go along with that.

Ergo, Resolution No. 1973, giving the Global Power Elite’s hand-picked “leaders” in France, the UK, the US and puppets in Italy, Spain and elsewhere their much needed “cloak of legality” to unilaterally attack Libya with their military forces. As expected, Resolution No. 1973 was quickly passed on 17 행진, ordering a “no fly zone” over Libya and authorising “air strikes.” The mainstream media obediently lent PsyWar coverage to Western incursions to the limit of irrationality, as their war-mongering is centred on a “Qadhafi must go” cry, and yet Qadhafi does not even hold any formal government post in the Libyan State. He does not need to; his prestige amongst his followers is sufficient, and that is what is making it especially difficult for the West to oust him…

The UN vote was not unanimous, 그러나: of the five permanent Security Council members, France, the UK and the US voted against Libya, whilst Russia and China abstained. The two other BRIC countries – Brazil and India – also abstained, as did Germany.

It is indicative of the perils all countries run today when we see Russia and China reluctant to veto such UK-France-US manoeuvring over the UN. Either one could have blocked unilateral military action, just as the US systematically blocks dozens of UN Resolutions condemning Israeli attacks against Palestine and its outrageous behaviour in the Middle East.3 중국, most likely, abstained in order not to irritate their pro-US-UK Saudi Arabian trade partners who now sell more oil to China than any other country. Russia, in turn, has complex ethnic issues of its own.

Here, in a nutshell, we have a brief snapshot of how Global Power works, the speed with which they were able to align the support of “the international community” to their goals and interests, naturally having the entire global mainstream media superstructure willing to oblige “justifying” their attack on Libya and silencing all other damning questions and evidence.

Our Kind of “Democracy…”

The extensive carve up and revamping of all of North Africa and the Islamic Middle East is very much in the forefront of the Global Power Elite’s plans, of which the attacks on Qadhafi’s Libya are but a chapter. In their march towards “democratisation” of the region, US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton made it abundantly clear what this means when, prior to her visit to Tunisia and Egypt at the end of March, she declared that the US has “an enormous stake in ensuring that Egypt and Tunisia provide models for the kind of democracy that we want to see.” Elsewhere, she added that the US wishes “to be a partner in the important work that lies ahead as (the region) embarks on a transition to a genuine democracy."4 (Emphasis mine)

And what is that “genuine” democracy the US, the UK, France, 스페인, Italy “want to see”? Simple: a mechanical vote-counting system fully dependent on the Money Power that feeds and controls political parties, politicians, journalists, anchor newsmen, universities, NGO’s and other public and private players. The practical effects of the brand of “democracy” that Hillary and her friends “want to see” are the “erosion piece by piece of Sovereign Nation-States” as planned by the Council on Foreign Relations. Increasingly, the remnants of “democratic states” are given the role of lending lip service to the Global Private Power System by spraying a thin, shiny layer of “legality” on it. Again in Hillary’s own words, she stressed “the difficulties of nurturing the institutions that support democracy, including robust political parties, a free media and the rule of law.”5

Déjà vu: Their Fingerprints
are all Over the Place

Writing from Argentina, I would point out some poignant parallels in this story with my country, on the diplomatic, military and PsyWar stages.

On the diplomatic and military side, three decades ago – during the heyday of Thatcher and Reagan – Argentina’s US-backed ruling Military Junta led by General Leopoldo Galtieri suddenly somersaulted and wrenched the Falkland-Malvinas Islands in the South Atlantic from British hands. That was on 2 April 1982 과, again the US and Britain manoeuvred with unheard of speed, rallying the support of “the international community.” Within 72 hours, UN 해상도 없음. 502 had been passed allowing the UK and US to “legally” take the islands back by force. Argentina’s sole option: unconditional surrender.

After a British nuclear submarine sank the Argentine destroyer “General Belgrano” outside the UK war exclusion zone, Argentina’s air force quickly reacted and sank or damaged over two dozen British ships, shot down scores of RAF jets, and heavily damaged both Britain’s aircraft carriers forcing them to withdraw from the war theatre, notably using French-made “Exocet”6 air-to-sea missiles, some of which were generously provided on very short notice by Col. Qadhafi’s Libya Arab Jamahiriya. For the UK, overwhelming defeat of Argentina was the sole option, and here lie the roots of our country’s present-day weakness and decadence.

On the PsyWar and political stages, the Global Power Elite threat to split Libya up into two or three new “democratic” countries would tie in with their agenda bent on eroding national sovereignty everywhere. We can also see their “fingerprint” if we compare Libya today with Argentina nine years ago, when at the height of our country’s almost total financial, banking and monetary collapse triggered by the Wall Street banksters which forced Argentina to default on its massive Foreign Debt, the 뉴욕 타임즈 published a high-profile article whose title said it all: “Some in Argentina see Secession as the Answer to Economic Peril.”7 In it they recommended that the immensely large and rich Patagonia Region in the south of the country, should secede from the rest of Argentina and then be traded with the Global Power Elite’s banking cartels to cancel the country’s foreign debt.

Clearly, territorial break-up is very much on the globalist agenda, whether in Argentina or Libya.8

A split up Libya would facilitate control of its massive oil wealth and strategic North African and Mediterranean geopolitical position. The logic is always the same: on the “hard road to world order” it is always easier to control a myriad of smaller, weaker and bickering countries than it is a few large, more powerful and coherent political entities.

How Do They Do It?

If asked to identify the Global Power Elite’s most powerful weapon, one might be tempted to respond saying it is their military fire power, or their money power, or their political prowess. But on a grander scale, their overriding main advantage – their “secret weapon” so to speak – is of a much more subtle nature: it is their uncanny talent and ability for very Long-Term Planning; and by “long-term” I mean not just decades but centuries. This entails a powerful capability of ensuring that their global plans are promoted generation after generation, and this requires, amongst other things, a very powerful, consistent and loyalty-based succession and communication system.

Long-Term Planning is probably their “best kept secret” not because they hide it from the public (which they don’t), but because the better part of mankind just cannot see it, for the simple reason that mass education in all countries in the world has increasingly shifted towards and focused on short-term thinking, modelling and planning. Whether in elementary school, high school or college, our basic training is centred on “learning to do things in our lives”: 나., learning a trade or profession, in order to “earn a living and get ahead in life.” “Life,” in today’s world, is being constrained to having a work career, marriage & child-rearing, “fun & entertainment,” and then as the decades go by, retirement and, 최종적으로, “game over”…

Short term thinking people are much easier to control, because they are intrinsically egotists in that, as I say, they have been reared just to “do things with their lives” (in a manner that is useful to the ongoing social system). Except under truly exception conditions where their personal lives and livelihood are threatened, people for the most part are reluctant to become involved in the greater picture of Man’s predicament on Earth. Mankind’s evolution (some might say involution) into what it has become today is the product of a very extensive chain of highly complex long-term processes, which 99% of the population cannot see simply because the subtleties of Long-Term thought and planning elude them. They have just plain not been educated for that.

The Global Power Elite – Deciders, Planners and Do-ers – however, are all “Long-Termers.” This is a key result of their inheriting vast power and wealth from their family, social and financial/industrial environments and networks, which quickly make a point of selecting their “best and brightest” and ensuring that they get a “proper education,” which basically means that Elites are trained in Long-Term thought, vision, and scenario modelling.

All nations today should understand that the only guarantee for national sovereignty lies not so much in maintaining powerful armed forces – which for countries in the Middle East, North Africa, Latin America and elsewhere is clearly impossible when confronting the US, 영국, and EU firepower – but rather in understanding the Global Power Elite’s key strengths and weaknesses. Then counter-PsyWar and PsyOps can be designed to mitigate and neutralise their hold over people’s minds everywhere. This requires understanding why they want us all to think and act in certain ways, and why they do not want us to think and act in certain other ways…

And one of those “other ways” they despise is when countries are truly Non-Aligned. When they retain the power to think and act independently, even if within cultural frameworks that may appear different from our own and even difficult for many of us to understand.

Clearly, Non-Alignment – whether in Nasser’s Egypt, Peron’s Argentina, Chavez’s Venezuela, Tito’s Yugoslavia, Assad’s Syria, the Ayatollah’s Iran, or Qadhafi’s Libya – is very much hated by the globalists, for the simple reason that beyond all local differences, Non-Alignment to the Global Power Elite inevitably leads to people valuing their own national sovereignty and independence above all other considerations, which in turn leads to the strengthening of Sovereign Nation-States.

과, the Sovereign Nation-State is the Global Power Elite’s Public Enemy Number One.

Footnotes

1. See my previous article “Global Elites Behind Chaos in Arab World” published in this issue of New Dawn magazine.

2. George Friedman, publisher of Stratfor Global Intelligence expressed these double standards most eloquently when he stated: “We’re not going to mess with Bahrain because we’re not going to get into a fight with the Saudis who support the current structure, and because it is where the United States keeps its (Indian Ocean) fleet.” See “US, UN won’t step in Bahrain mess say experts”, The Boston Herald, 21 행진.

3. 부터 1982 에 2006, the US vetoed 32 UN Security Council Resolutions condemning Israeli policies and behaviour and systematically blocked Arab efforts to put the subject of Israel’s nuclear weapons arsenal on the International Atomic Energy Agency’s agenda, the State of Israel being the sole country in the Middle East that has atomic Weapons of Mass Destruction and a proven track record of its willingness to use them.

4. “Clinton to stress democracy in Egypt, Tunisia trip” by Andrew Quinn, The New York Times, 10 행진.

5. “Clinton to tell Egyptians democracy takes time” by Arshad Mohammed, The New York Times, 14 행진.

6. So concerned were the British over their losses at the height of the Falklands-Malvinas War in 1982, that then French President Francoise Mitterand confessed to his psychoanalyst that “The Iron Lady” Margaret Thatcher had threatened to drop a nuclear bomb over Argentina’s second largest city of Córdoba if Mitterand did not hand over to her the secret air defense codes of the French “Exocet” missiles in the hands of the Argentine military. 보기 Rendez-vous: The Psychoanalysis of Francois Mitterrand by Ali Magoudi, the French president’s psychoanalyst from 1982 에 1993.

7. Article by Larry Rohter,  The New York Times, 27 August 2002.

8. 다가오는 세계 정부: 비극 & 기대?, 장 7 – “Territory in Jeopardy: The Patagonia”, 애드리안 Salbuchi에 의해, available at www.asalbuchi.com.ar.

애드리안 Salbuchi is a political analyst, 저자, speaker and radio talk-show host in Argentina. He has published several books on Geopolitics and Economics in Spanish, and recently published his first eBook in English: 다가오는 세계 정부: 비극 & 기대? which can be ordered through his web site www.asalbuchi.com.ar, or details can be requested by E-mail to arsalbuchi@gmail.com. Salbuchi is 58 years of age, 결혼한, with four adult children, and works as strategic consultant for domestic and international companies. He is also founder of the Second Republic Project in Argentina, which is expanding internationally (visit: www.secondrepublicproject.com).

The above article appears in New Dawn 126 (May-June 2011).

www.newdawnmagazine.com